Return to Proposal Finder FY 2001 Ongoing Proposal 198906600

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget Summary

Reviews and Recommendations
No documents associated with this request


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Annual Stock Assessment-Coded Wire Tag Program (WDFW)
BPA Project Proposal Number 198906600
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Business acronym (if appropriate) WDFW
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Howard Fuss
Mailing Address 600 Capitol Way N
City, State, Zip Olympia, WA 98501-1091
Phone 3609022664
Fax 3609022943
E-mail fusshjf@dfw.wa.gov
 
Manager of program authorizing this project Howard Fuss
 
Review Cycle FY 2001 Ongoing
Province Systemwide
Subbasin Systemwide
 
Short Description Apply coded-wire tags to production of coho and chinook salmon at WDFW Columbia Basin hatcheries for stock assessment of hatchery and wild populations. Evaluate survival, contribution and stray rates of hatchery reared fish and compare to wild fish.
Target Species


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


Biological Outcomes of this project: This marking program is not expected to have any direct biological effect on wild salmon and only minimal biological effect on the hatchery salmon (e.g., slightly lower survival rates than unmarked salmon). The monitoring data collected from these marked fish is expected to be used to evaluate hatchery production, and be used to compare survival, distribution and straying trends with other marked groups in the Columbia Basin and west coast. These data will may lead to improvements in hatchery practices and biological performance of hatchery reared salmon and allow for monitoring of impacts of hatchery salmon on wild salmon (e.g., straying)
Biological Data: Currently there are tag return data from Washington, Oregon and Idaho which are stored in the PSMFC data base. These data include total recoveries from each tag group and location of recoveries (freshwater and marine). From these data assessment of hatchery fish performance is made and reported in annual reports submitted to BPA, and data are available on-line from PSMFC for use in other evaluations. Annual Reports compare performance of each tag group released at each hatchery. These data are provided to compare intra and inter-brood performance in the Basin. These data can be used to assess stray rates to determine if hatchery fish are impacting wild spawning populations.


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
1990 Tagged 1,434,101 chinook and coho
1991 Tagged 1,377,166 chinook and coho
1992 Tagged 1,299,245 chinook and coho
1993 Tagged 2,473,946 chinook and coho and collected 3,148 tags from returning adults
1994 Tagged 2,473,946 chinook and coho and collected 3,794 tags from returning adults
1995 Tagged 1,855,939 chinook and coho and collected 2,673 tags from returning adults
1996 Tagged 1,798,528 chinook and coho and collected 1,266 tags from returning adults
1997 Tagged 2,180,255 chinook and coho and collected 3,618 tags from returning adults
1998 Tagged 2,094,605 chinook and coho and collected 7,200 tags from returning adults
1999 Tagged approximately 1,448,703 chinook and coho. Tag collection data not finalized.
2000 Tagging and tag recovery is not completed for this year.


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information


Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Planning and Design Phase

n/a or no information


Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Construction and Implementation Phase

n/a or no information


Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Operations and Maintenance Phase

n/a or no information


Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. Coded-wire tag at least one group of smolts from each hatchery a. Coordinate tagging with all appropriate entities On going $ 5,295  
b. Apply coded-wire tags into snouts and remove adipose fin of 2 million salmon at 8 hatcheries On going $307,719  
2.Recover snouts, decode tags, and use information to estimate survival of tagged groups a. Collect snouts from adult salmon returning to hatcheries On going $ 5,295  
b. Decode tags, check and verify data and report to PSMFC data base On going $ 33,901  
c. Access central data base and estimate survival and distribution On going $ 9,331  
d. Analyze results and recommend improvements On going $ 9,330  
3. . Develop preliminary catch, escapement and distribution data for all Columbia River Hatcheries a. Retrieve coded-wire tag data from PSMFC data bas On going $ 9,329  
b. Analyze catch, distribution and escapement data and provided written narrative On going $ 28,543  
c. Report results at Technical or Project Review conferences On going $ 2,470  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2002 FY 2003
$449,344 $462,824 $423,550 $436,256


Section 8. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2001 Cost
Personnel FTE: Fish Biologist 4 (2 mos); FB3, 5 mos; FB2 5 mos; ST2 9 mos $ 69,001
Fringe 20% of salaries $ 13,800
Supplies 2,205,000 CWT @ $113/1000 (includes tag supervisor costs) $249,165
Travel Meetings in Portland etc. $ 1,000
Indirect 23.5% of above $ 78,247
Total Itemized Budget $411,213


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 project cost $411,213
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 2001 budget request $411,213
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 $385,067
% change from forecast 6.8%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Agency overhead increased from 20% to 23.5% and a 3% COLA will be in effect during 2001.


Reason for change in scope

None


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

2002 2003 2004 2005
Monitoring and evaluation $423,550 $436,256 $449,344 $462,824
Total Outyear Budgets $423,550 $436,256 $449,344 $462,824
 

Other Budget Explanation

Not applicable


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

This project has not yet been reviewed

Return to top of page