Return to Proposal Finder FY 2001 Ongoing Proposal 199101901

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget Summary

Reviews and Recommendations
No documents associated with this request


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Hungry Horse Fisheries Mitigation - Flathead Lake
BPA Project Proposal Number 199101901
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes
Business acronym (if appropriate) CSKT
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Barry Hansen
Mailing Address PO Box 278
City, State, Zip Pablo, MT 59860
Phone 4066752700
Fax 4066752739
E-mail barryh@cskt.org
 
Manager of program authorizing this project Les Evarts
 
Review Cycle FY 2001 Ongoing
Province Mountain Columbia
Subbasin Flathead
 
Short Description Implement and monitor fisheries improvement activities within the Flathead Indian Reservation portion of the Flathead Lake basin. Research factors limiting successful application of mitigation measures within Flathead Lake.
Target Species


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


Biological Outcomes of this project: Recovery of native resident species, especially bull and westslope cutthroat trout. Incremental restoration of the inherent biological capabilities of the Flathead system through restoration and reconnection of habitats.
Biological Data: Long term data sets for fisheries, primary production and physical habitat variables are well represented. Where data gaps exist, new sampling strategies have been implemented. For example, monitoring variables are identified for each specific habitat restoration project, and others are maintained for the basin-level responses. Baselines have been established, and annual or multi-year trends are being measured following those baselines. Specific techniques employed are creel surveys, stream channel dimension and substrate condition measures, and bioenergetic and population modeling.


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): resident


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
94 Monitoring: Completion of the 1992-93 Flathead Lake Creel survey.
95 Implementation: Reconstruction of groundwater seepage on Polson Golf Course into a stream channel flowing into Flathead Lake.
98 Implementation: Channel reconstruction in Skidoo Creek to allow passage of fish through a culvert barrier.
98 Monitoring: Completion of monitoring of the Flathead Lake kokanee experiment.
98 Planning: Progress Report summarizing data collected in Dayton Creek for the purpose of identifying restoration priorities
99 Monitoring: Completion of the 1998-99 Flathead Lake Creel survey
99 Implementation: Riparian fencing and removal of an over-channel corral from Dayton Creek.


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information


Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. In conjunction with Project # 9608701, develop site specific restoration projects a. Continue watershed level reviews of degraded sites that influence the factors limiting fisheries production. indefinite $ 7,956  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Planning and Design Phase

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2002 FY 2003
$ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000


Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. Implement specific habitat restoration projects that we identified as influencing the factors limiting fish production. a. Culvert removal and bridge construction on Red Lake Road. one $ 33,068  
b. Reconstruction of Hawkins irrigation diversions. one $ 4,000  
c. Reconstruction of Crafton culvert one $ 2,000  
d. Removal of Laudermilk in-stream dam one $ 4,000  
e. Construction and maintenance of Dayton Creek sediment trap indefinite $ 3,000  
f. Fencing of 3 miles of riparian area indefinite $ 14,000  
g. Removal of culvert and road fill on old Lake Mary Ronan Road one $ 3,000  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Construction and Implementation Phase

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2002 FY 2003
$ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000


Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. Purchase of equipment and materials to support mitigation projects a. Purchase equipment, and provide for repair of existing equipment as needed. indefinite $ 2,400  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Operations and Maintenance Phase

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2002 FY 2003
$ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000


Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. Monitoring native species abundance in Flathead Lake a. Spring gillnetting indefinite $ 8,000  
2. Monitoring biology of lake trout in Flathead Lake a. Fall gillnetting indefinite $ 11,624  
3. Monitoring success of off-site fish plants a. creel surveys and fish sampling indefinite $ 5,000  
4. Monitoring exploitation rates of sport fish in Flathead Lake a. year-long creel survey one $ 20,000  
4. Research in factors controlling Mysis abundance in Flathead Lake. a. Biweekly Mysis sampling with associated limnological parameters two $ 48,000  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2002 FY 2003
$105,000 $105,000 $105,000 $105,000


Section 8. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2001 Cost
Personnel FTE: 0.1 $ 3,000
Fringe 21% $ 630
Indirect 20%-requested rate waiting for approval 14% is current approved rate $ 1,326
NEPA $ 3,000
Subcontractor University of Montana $ 0
Personnel FTE: .3 $ 9,000
Fringe 21% $ 1,890
Supplies $ 10,000
Indirect 20%-requested rate waiting for approval 14% is current approved rate $ 2,178
Subcontractor $ 40,000
Supplies $ 2,000
Indirect 20%-requested rate waiting for approval 14% is current approved rate $ 400
Personnel FTE: 1.8 $ 28,000
Fringe 21% $ 13,020
Supplies $ 2,000
Travel $ 6,000
Indirect 20%-requested rate waiting for approval 14% if current approved rate $ 23,604
Subcontractor $ 20,000
Total Itemized Budget $166,048


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 project cost $166,048
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 2001 budget request $166,048
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 $ 95,000
% change from forecast 74.8%


Reason for change in estimated budget

The budget increase is the result of the transfer of funds from Project # 9608701 as directed by BPA, and additional specific habitat restoration projects scheduled for completion in FY2001.


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

2002 2003 2004 2005
Planning and design $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000
Construction/implementation $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000
Operations and maintenance $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000
Monitoring and evaluation $105,000 $105,000 $105,000 $105,000
Total Outyear Budgets $196,000 $196,000 $196,000 $196,000
 

Other Budget Explanation

Not applicable


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

CBFWA Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
2001
$166,048
Comment:
CSKT intends to fund $20,000 with a cost share.

NWPPC Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000
2001
$166,048
Comment:
Project budget incorporates implementation costs from 1996-087-01

NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC Start of Year:
$143,942
FY06 NPCC Staff Preliminary:
$143,942
FY06 NPCC July Draft Start of Year:
$143,942
Sponsor (Salish & Kootenai Tribes) Comments (Go to Original on NPCC Website):

Return to top of page