Return to Proposal Finder FY 2001 Ongoing Proposal 199106000

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget Summary

Reviews and Recommendations
No documents associated with this request


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Pend Oreille Wetlands Wildlife Mitigation Project - Kalispel
BPA Project Proposal Number 199106000
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Kalispel Tribe of Indians
Business acronym (if appropriate) KNRD
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Ray D. Entz
Mailing Address P.O. Box 39
City, State, Zip Usk, WA 99180
Phone 5094451147
Fax 5094455302
E-mail rentz@knrd.org
 
Manager of program authorizing this project Ray D. Entz
 
Review Cycle FY 2001 Ongoing
Province Mountain Columbia
Subbasin Pend Oreille
 
Short Description Protect, restore, enhance and maintain important wetland/riparian wildlife habitat along the Pend Oreille River as partial mitigation for the construction and operation impacts associated with Albeni Falls Dam consistent with regional planning documents.
Target Species


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


Biological Outcomes of this project: The expectation is that the Tribe will maintain and enhance approximately 1,300 HUs and 600 acres over the life of the project. The process of protecting and enhancing land for wildlife would provide both immediate and long-term benefits to habitat and wildlife populations. Habitat protection and enhancement would result in an increase of wetland, riparian and upland plant and animal diversity and in vegetative cover types. Site protection activities and termination of land use practices harmful to native vegetation, such as livestock grazing, is sufficient in itself to improve habitat conditions and increase healthy wildlife populations. Habitat enhancements will further increase plant cover, and, as native plants become re-established, waterfowl, aquatic furbearers, and other important target species would be provided with an increase in essential food and cover resources.
Biological Data: Available habitat data includes: tree canopy closure, average height of overstory trees, number of snags, height and density of residual vegetation, presence of seasonal wetlands, percent shoreline dominated by emergent and/or scrub vegetation, ground cover height, percent canopy cover of emergent herbaceous vegetation, percent deciduous shrub crown cover, and average height shrub canopy. Available wildlife data includes: bald eagle nest location and nesting activity, Canada goose nesting activity and brood counts, waterfowl nesting activity and brood counts, neotropical migratory bird presence/absence, and white-tailed deer counts.


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): wildlife


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
1992 Land acquisition of 436 acre parcel for baseline protection of 371 HU's
1993 Began management efforts on the project
1994 Completed bio-engineered shoreline stabilization projects on highly eroded banks
1995 Completed implementation of three wetland control structures for increased wetland quantity, quality, and diversity
1996 Completed the construction of two nesting islands for waterfowl
1997 Land acquisition of additional 164 acre adjacent parcel for baseline protection of 246 HU's
1997 Five-year HEP update on original purchase showing an increase of 182 HU's through management activities
1998 Completed 25 acres of riparian cottonwood reforestation on the main acquisition site
1998 Completed 30 acres of hardwood stand improvement on the main acquisition site
1998 Completed the draft management plan for the additional parcel
1999 Implemented breeding and wintering bird surveys
1999 Implemented objectives and tasks consistent with the project management plans


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information


Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Planning and Design Phase

n/a or no information


Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. Restore and enhance approximately 600 acres and 700 Habitat Units (HUs) on the two properties comprising the project a. Restore approximately 30 acres of eroded shoreline into a riparian black cottonwood forest 2 $ 16,100  
b. Increase hardwood stands densities from 100 stems/acre to 900 stems/acre 2 $ 10,000  
c. Restore approximately 20 acres of pasture to scrub-shrub wetland habitat 2 $ 11,500  
d. Increase wetland quantity by approximately 90 surface acres and quality by using moist soil management techniques 2 $ 10,000  
e. Increase overall stand health and individual tree heights using standard silviculture practices 2 $ 9,000  
f. Stabilize and protect 1,500 feet of eroding shoreline and manage pasture for meeting life history requisites of various waterfowl 2 $ 11,000 x
g. Reduce human disturbance to species/habitats 2 $ 5,000  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Construction and Implementation Phase

FY 2002 FY 2003
$ 75,500 $ 78,500


Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. Operate and maintain approximately 600 acres and 1,300 HUs on the two properties comprising the project a. Property management and reporting requirements on-going for life of project $ 8,000  
b. Management enforcement on-going for life of project $ 5,000  
c. Fire protection and fire management on-going for life of project $ 7,500  
d. fence repair and maintenance on-going for life of project $ 13,500  
e. water control structure management, operation and maintenance on-going for life of project $ 13,000  
f. Building maintenance on-going for life of project $ 4,000  
g. Noxious weed control on-going for life of project $ 5,530 x
h. Maintain habitat improvements on-going for life of project $ 10,000  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Operations and Maintenance Phase

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2002 FY 2003
$ 75,000 $ 78,000 $ 69,200 $ 72,000


Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. Monitor and evaluate wildlife habitat and management activities on 600 acres a. Conduct HEP on 5-year intervals to determine increase in HUs from enhancement measures on-going for life of project $ 4,000  
b. Conduct appropriate wildlife guild/species population surveys on a random basis on-going for life of project $ 5,000 x
c. Monitor burned areas at regular intervals including soil and vegetation response on-going for life of project $ 2,000  
d. Monitor control of noxious weeds on-going for life of project $ 1,500  
e. Monitor human use on-going for life of project $ 1,000  
f. Amend and update management plans as necessary on-going for life of project $ 3,370  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2002 FY 2003
$ 19,000 $ 19,800 $ 17,600 $ 18,300


Section 8. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2001 Cost
Personnel FTE: 1.15 $ 35,300
Fringe $ 10,236
Supplies $ 3,500
Travel $ 1,760
Indirect $ 11,102
Capital 50% of truck and office space $ 5,202
Subcontractor heavy equipment leasing $ 5,500
Personnel FTE: .925 $ 28,240
Fringe $ 8,189
Supplies $ 8,650
Travel $ 1,408
Indirect $ 8,882
Capital 40% of truck and office space $ 4,161
Subcontractor Weed control and heavy equipment leasing $ 7,000
Personnel FTE: .225 $ 7,061
Fringe $ 2,047
Supplies $ 150
Travel $ 352
Indirect $ 2,220
Capital 10% of truck and office space $ 1,040
Subcontractor Population/habitat surveys $ 4,000
Total Itemized Budget $156,000


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 project cost $156,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 2001 budget request $156,000
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 $156,000
% change from forecast 0.0%


Reason for change in estimated budget

N/A


Reason for change in scope

N/A


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

2002 2003 2004 2005
Construction/implementation $ 75,500 $ 78,500 $ 0 $ 0
Operations and maintenance $ 69,200 $ 72,000 $ 75,000 $ 78,000
Monitoring and evaluation $ 17,600 $ 18,300 $ 19,000 $ 19,800
Total Outyear Budgets $162,300 $168,800 $ 94,000 $ 97,800
 

Other Budget Explanation

Not applicable


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

CBFWA Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
2001
$156,000
Comment:

NWPPC Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000
2001
$156,000
Comment:

NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC Start of Year:
$ 99,250
FY06 NPCC Staff Preliminary:
$ 99,250
FY06 NPCC July Draft Start of Year:
$ 99,250
Sponsor (Kalispel Tribe Of Indians) Comments (Go to Original on NPCC Website):

Return to top of page