Return to Proposal Finder FY 2001 Ongoing Proposal 199200900

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget Summary

Reviews and Recommendations
No documents associated with this request


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Yakima [Fish] Screens - Phase 2 O&M
BPA Project Proposal Number 199200900
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Business acronym (if appropriate) WDFW
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Patrick C. Schille
Mailing Address 3705 W Washington Ave
City, State, Zip Yakima, WA 98903-1137
Phone 5095752735
Fax 5094544139
E-mail schilpcs@dfw.wa.gov
 
Manager of program authorizing this project Patrick C Schille
 
Review Cycle FY 2001 Ongoing
Province Columbia Plateau
Subbasin Yakima
 
Short Description YSS performs preventative and emergency maintenance and operational adjustment on completed Yakima Phase 2 fish screen facilities to assure optimal fish protection performance and to extend facility life, thereby protecting BPA's capital investment.
Target Species


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


Biological Outcomes of this project: Through proper operation and maintenance these facilities provide "protection from mortality or injury to all species and life stages of anadromous and resident salmonids associated with irrigation diversions". Proven juvenile fish survival at Yakima Basin gravity water diversions is widely believed to be important in improving overall egg-to-smolt survival of critically depressed stocks of naturally-produced spring chinook, fall chinook, and steelhead This also applies to the progeny of future returning adult YKFP supplementation fish that will naturally reproduce on the spawning grounds. This on-going preventative screen operation and maintenance is a complementary "infrastructure" investment intended to safeguard and enhance the other FWP anadromous fish recovery investments in the basin.
Biological Data: In order to measure the effectiveness of new screens, and their operation and maintenance, the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has established a monitoring and evaluation program to ensure that the screening facilities meet fish protection goals. This monitoring and evaluation program is performed by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. PNNL has an on-going contract with BPA, starting in 1985, to perform screen monitoring and evaluation within the Yakima Basin and has compiled over fifteen reports on screening facilities. BPA has also contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation to perform Review of Operations and Maintenance (ROM). These reviews are conducted by a BOR engineer, every four year, who evaluates the mechanic of the sites for long term operation and maintenance needs. Long term reliability of screen sites and their proper operation is critical to the protection of all species of fish associated with them.


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
1993 The WDFW, YSS first became involved with Phase II Screen Operation & Maintenance. We started with six sites
1994 Sites increased to nine, Spring , Routine, and Annual maintenance was performed on all sites, included record keeping
1995 Sites increased to twelve, additional projects were added to address safe items not incorporated during construction. Flooding was a major problem this year.
1996 Sites increased to 15, one site was re-assigned to BOR. The budget was increased to cover flood damage from 1995
1997 Sites increased to 18, Spring, Routine, and Annual maintenance was performed on all sites, including recording keeping
1998 Sites increased to 21, Spring, Routine, and Annual maintenance was performed on all sites, including recording keeping
1999 New sites added this year were assigned to BOR, normal O&M was performed on all sites. Budget was increased for major repairs to Gleed site (screen cloth replacement) and repair of ROM identified deficiency.
2000 No new sites were added this year because of right-of-way issues, normal O&M was performed on all sites.


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information


Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Planning and Design Phase

n/a or no information


Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Construction and Implementation Phase

n/a or no information


Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
Provide fish protection at irrigation diversions Perform Operation and Maintenance on BPA Phase II fish screen facilities within the Yakima Basin. One year budget on-going $141,120  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Operations and Maintenance Phase

FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2002 FY 2003
$163,364 $171,532 $148,176 $155,584


Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

n/a or no information


Section 8. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2001 Cost
Personnel FTE: 1.5 $ 57,388
Fringe $ 17,790
Supplies $ 5,929
Travel $ 12,086
Indirect $ 32,927
Capital $ 15,000
Total Itemized Budget $141,120


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 project cost $141,120
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 2001 budget request $141,120
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 $140,000
% change from forecast 0.8%


Reason for change in estimated budget

N/A


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

2002 2003 2004 2005
Operations and maintenance $148,176 $155,584 $163,364 $171,532
Total Outyear Budgets $148,176 $155,584 $163,364 $171,532
 

Other Budget Explanation

Not applicable


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

CBFWA Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
2001
$141,120
Comment:

NWPPC Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000
2001
$135,000
Comment:

NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC Start of Year:
$139,590
FY06 NPCC Staff Preliminary:
$139,590
FY06 NPCC July Draft Start of Year:
$139,590
Sponsor (WDFW - Olympia) Comments (Go to Original on NPCC Website):

Return to top of page