Return to Proposal Finder FY 2001 Ongoing Proposal 199705700

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget Summary

Reviews and Recommendations
No documents associated with this request


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Salmon River Production Program
BPA Project Proposal Number 199705700
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
Business acronym (if appropriate) SBT
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Michael Haddix
Mailing Address
City, State, Zip Fort Hall, ID. 83203
Phone 2084783743
Fax 2084783742
E-mail salmon1@cyberhighway.net
 
Manager of program authorizing this project Chad Colter
 
Review Cycle FY 2001 Ongoing
Province Mountain Snake
Subbasin Salmon
 
Short Description Rehabilitate salmon and steelhead populations in the upper Salmon River basin
Target Species


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


Biological Outcomes of this project: If survival rates of salmon and steelhead can be increased by improving survival through migratory corridors, and continued habitat improvement ,then onsite incubation can be a useful tool in the rehabilitation of populations to their historical spawning and rearing habitats. Considering the critical condition of the upper Salmon River populations , The Shoshone - Bannock Tribes believe all potential methods of reestablishing these populations mush be explored. The eventual outcome will be naturally spawning populations of salmon and steelhead in tributaries of the upper Salmon River, at level which will provide a sustained harvest by tribal members.
Biological Data: Shoshone-Bannock Tribes summary report. STEELHEAD, SPRING AND SUMMER CHINOOK SALMON RIVER ON SITE INCUBATION PROGRAM 1995 TO 1999


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
1997 Planted 1,000,000 Steelhead and 345,660 chinook eggs, with hatch rates of 75.5 and 19.7 percent respectively.
1998 Planted 1,050,210 steelhead and 29,992 chinook eggs ,with hatch rates of 81.6 and 84.0 percent respectively
1999 Planted 836,960 steelhead and 150,000 chinook eggs


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information


Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
Continue development and evolution of basin production and harvest Master Plan develop annual production and harvest plans within Master Plan framework continuous $116,830  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Planning and Design Phase

FY 2005 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2002
$ 10,000 $ 29,000 $ 15,000 $ 57,000


Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
Continue production program as defined by basin Master Plan a.continue on site production including supplementation via egg plants fry acclimation, smolt releases and smolt acclimation facilities. continuous $ 63,777  
b.Construct on site incubation ,central incubation egg holding and transfer facilities , fry and smolt acclimation facilities $ 68,777  
Implement full scale M&E program to quantify results of production programs a. construct adult counting facilities at production sites . $ 73,777  
b. develop juvenile enumeration and marking facilities $ 0  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Construction and Implementation Phase

FY 2005 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2002
$115,000 $110,000 $110,000 $100,000


Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Operations and Maintenance Phase

n/a or no information


Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
Expand M&E program to adequately access production programs , and develop recommendations for future basin wide artificial production a. develop ongoing evaluation program to quantify results of production programs . continuous $ 48,165  
b. Access production programs and adjust to produce efficient and successful on site production. $ 48,165  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

FY 2005 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2002
$120,000 $115,000 $120,000 $110,000


Section 8. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2001 Cost
Personnel FTE: 3 $ 39,627
Fringe $ 13,653
Travel $ 2,000
Indirect $ 11,550
NEPA $ 25,000
Subcontractor $ 25,000
Personnel FTE: 3 $ 39,630
Fringe $ 13,651
Supplies $ 12,500
Travel $ 9,000
Indirect $ 11,550
Capital $100,000
NEPA $ 10,000
Subcontractor $ 10,000
Personnel FTE: 3 $ 39,627
Fringe $ 13,653
Supplies $ 12,500
Travel $ 9,000
Indirect $ 11,550
PIT tags $ 5,000
Subcontractor $ 5,000
Total Itemized Budget $419,491


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 project cost $419,491
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 5,000
Total FY 2001 budget request $414,491
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 $900,000
% change from forecast -53.9%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Initial cost of developing Master Plan and expanding production and Monitoring and Evaluation over estimated. Ability to proceed at previously proposed level of production is not possible at this time. Work on Master Plan has identified limiting factors which in the short term of two to three life cycles precludes such rapid expansion of production .


Reason for change in scope

same as above


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

2002 2003 2004 2005
Planning and design $ 57,000 $ 29,000 $ 15,000 $ 10,000
Construction/implementation $100,000 $110,000 $110,000 $115,000
Monitoring and evaluation $110,000 $115,000 $120,000 $120,000
Total Outyear Budgets $267,000 $254,000 $245,000 $245,000
 

Other Budget Explanation

Not applicable


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

This project has not yet been reviewed

Return to top of page