Return to Proposal Finder FY 2001 Ongoing Proposal 199801700

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget Summary

Reviews and Recommendations
No documents associated with this request


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Eliminate Gravel Push-up Dams in Lower North Fork John Day
BPA Project Proposal Number 199801700
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
North Fork John Day Watershed Council
Business acronym (if appropriate) NFJDWC
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Robert Stubblefield
Mailing Address P.O. Box 95
City, State, Zip Monument, OR 97864
Phone 5419342141
Fax 5419342312
E-mail waterguy@transport.com
 
Manager of program authorizing this project Jack Cavender, Chairman, Monument SWCD
 
Review Cycle FY 2001 Ongoing
Province Columbia Plateau
Subbasin John Day
 
Short Description Eliminate gravel push-up dams in the lower North Fork John Day River. Replace with permanent pumping stations resulting in removal of passage impediments and elimination of annual instream modification.
Target Species


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


Biological Outcomes of this project: Improved juvenile and adult passage, improved riparian function, possible reduction in summer water temperatures.
Biological Data: Water quality measurements, spawning ground counts, and intesnive surveys for North Fork and significant tributaries.


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
1998 Replaced gravel push-up dams at River Meadows Ranch and Schultz Ranches with permanent pumping stations.
1998 Monitored water temperatures and overall water quality throughout summer season.
1998 Initiated and proposed projects to replace five additional push-up dams.
1999 Completed design for installations to replace three push-up dams with permanent pumping stations.


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information


Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. NEPA Review a. Complete NEPA checklist 1 $ 2,000  
2. NMFS Consultation b. Complete Section 7 Consultation 1 $ 2,000  
3. Design Projects a. Engineer Project Designs 1 $ 7,600 x


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Planning and Design Phase

FY 2002
$ 12,000


Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. Power Installation a. Relocate powerlines to location of permanent pumping installations. 1 $ 18,000 x
2. Install permanent pumping stations a. Purchase materials for installations. 1 $ 50,500  
b. Install materials. 1 $ 20,000 x


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Construction and Implementation Phase

FY 2002
$ 90,000


Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. Clean permanent pumping stations. a. Annually pump accumulated silt from systems. 1 $ 2,000  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Operations and Maintenance Phase

FY 2005 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2002
$ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000


Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. Monitor water quality. a. Install temperature monitors at each project site. 1 $ 500  
b. Compute and store data. 1 $ 1,000  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

FY 2005 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2002
$ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500


Section 8. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2001 Cost
Personnel FTE: .1 $ 3,000
Travel $ 500
Indirect $ 1,100
Subcontractor $ 7,000
Supplies $ 47,000
Travel $ 1,000
Indirect $ 4,500
Subcontractor $ 36,000
Supplies $ 2,000
Personnel FTE: .05 $ 1,500
Total Itemized Budget $103,600


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 project cost $103,600
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 2001 budget request $103,600
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 $ 90,250
% change from forecast 14.8%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Cost of installation materials (PVC pipe) have risen dramatically due to higher oil prices.


Reason for change in scope

Not applicable


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

2002 2003 2004 2005
Planning and design $ 12,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Construction/implementation $ 90,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Operations and maintenance $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000
Monitoring and evaluation $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500
Total Outyear Budgets $104,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,500
 

Other Budget Explanation

Not applicable


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

CBFWA Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
2001
$103,600
Comment:
The budget has increased due to a dramatic rise in the cost of installation materials (PVC pipe) because of higher oil prices. There is no change in the scope of work.

NWPPC Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000
2001
$ 95,100
Comment:
Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review. Project has not used $90,250 budgeted for 2000. Check availability of carry-forward.

NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC Start of Year:
$105,134
FY06 NPCC Staff Preliminary:
$105,134
FY06 NPCC July Draft Start of Year:
$105,134
Sponsor (Monument Soil & Water Conservation District) Comments (Go to Original on NPCC Website):

Return to top of page