Return to Proposal Finder FY 2001 Ongoing Proposal 199802200

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget Summary

Reviews and Recommendations
No documents associated with this request


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Pine Creek Ranch
BPA Project Proposal Number 199802200
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon
Business acronym (if appropriate) CTWSRO
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Terry A. Luther
Mailing Address Natural Resources Department, P.O. Box C
City, State, Zip Warm Springs, OR 97761
Phone 5415533548
Fax 5415531994
E-mail taluther@yahoo.com
 
Manager of program authorizing this project Terry A. Luther
 
Review Cycle FY 2001 Ongoing
Province Columbia Plateau
Subbasin John Day
 
Short Description Complete acquisition of Pine Creek Ranch. Develop management plans and begin implementation of restoration activities to mitigate for fish and wildlife losses associated with the John Day hydro facility.
Target Species


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


Biological Outcomes of this project: Riparian and upland habitat conditions on 30,000 acres are expected to improve due to removal of livestock and discontinuing farming practices. Water quality and flows are expected to improve due to road closures and removal of livestock. Fish and wildlife populations will improve over time as habitat conditions improve. Existing and created habitat values will be measured in habitat units.
Biological Data: Fish redd counts and big game inventories have been conducted for many years by ODFW. These baseline counts will be used to measure outcomes. Additionally, HEP surveys will be completed and used to measure existing and post enhancement habitat values.


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): wildlife


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
1997 Pine Creek Ranch identified as a potential mitigation site.
1998 Pine Creek Ranch proposal reviewed, ranked and approved as a mitigation project with $450K approved for pre-acquisition and planning costs.
1998 Begin Landowner negotiations.
1999 $1.2 M dollars available from the Anadromous budget Watershed funds which includes $450K carry forward funds and $1.6 M dollars available from Wildlife fund budget for acquisition of the property.
1999 Appraisal completed with fair market value determined at 5.6M, twice the amount the Landowner was asking in 1997.
1999 NWPPC approved partial funding ($3.2M) to purchase Pine Creek Ranch with the remaining funds to be prioritized and funded by the Oregon Wildlife Coalition in FY2001.
1999 Cultural survey, hazardous materials survey, T&E species review and NEPA checklist completed.
1999 Pine Creek Ranch purchased in September with $3.2M paid to the Landowner and the remainder ($2.4M plus interest) carried by the Landowner. MOA between BPA and CTWSRO completed and signed . Also an option on the Wagner property was included in the sale.
2000 Appraisal completed on the Wagner Ranch, fair market value determined to be $2.55M.
2000 Contract for Pine Creek Ranch FY2000 budget established with BPA for $108, 797.


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information


Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1) Design management plans for Pine Creek ranch. Note: A portion of funds to achieve this objective are FY 2000 carryover dollars. a) complete watershed management plan 3 years $ 4,500  
b) complete wildlife management plan 1 year $ 2,500  
c) design transportation plan 1 year $ 1,000  
d) design water resources plan 1 year $ 1,500  
e) complete easements 1 year $ 1,320  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Planning and Design Phase

FY 2003 FY 2002
$ 5,000 $ 5,000


Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1) Complete acquisition of Pine Creek Ranch a) disperse funds to appropriate parties. 1 year $ 0  
Note: Funds to achieve this objective are requested in FY 2001 project no. 199705900. $ 0  
2) Begin transportation project implementation $ 0  
Note: A portion of funds to achieve this objective are FY 2000 carry forward dollars. a) install gates 2 years $ 2,000  
b) close roads 2 years $ 5,000 x
c) develop access sites 2 years $ 2,000 x
Begin watershed restoration activities $ 0  
Note: A portion of funds to achieve this objective are FY 2000 carry forward dollars. a) implement streambank protection 5 years $ 10,000 x
b) begin habitat replacement projects 5 years $ 14,200  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Construction and Implementation Phase

FY 2005 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2002
$ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000


Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1) Maintenance of property and resources ongoing $ 0  
a) maintenance and protection of buildings ongoing $ 30,000  
b) maintenance and protection of habitats ongoing $ 25,000  
c) maintenance and protection of fish and wildlife resources ongoing $ 25,000  
d) oversight of management plans ongoing $ 25,000  
e) public relations ongoing $ 10,000  
f) enforcement of management plans ongoing $ 5,000  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Operations and Maintenance Phase

FY 2005 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2002
$130,000 $125,000 $127,500 $122,500


Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1) Monitor and evaluate species and habitats $ 0  
a) conduct big game surveys ongoing $ 3,000  
b) conduct fish redd counts ongoing $ 500  
c) conduct bird counts ongoing $ 1,500  
d) monitor habitat projects ongoing $ 6,350  
2) Record and report survey information $ 0  
a) complete and submit reports ongoing $ 500  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

FY 2005 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2002
$ 12,750 $ 12,250 $ 12,500 $ 12,000


Section 8. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2001 Cost
Personnel FTE: 0.15 $ 5,000
Fringe 23% $ 1,150
Supplies $ 500
Travel $ 1,000
Indirect 41.4% $ 3,170
Personnel FTE: 0.2 $ 5,000
Fringe 23% $ 1,150
Supplies $ 5,000
Travel $ 1,000
Indirect 41.4% $ 5,050
Subcontractor $ 16,000
Personnel FTE: 1.0 $ 30,000
Fringe 23% $ 6,900
Supplies $ 38,200
Travel $ 9,500
Indirect 41.4% $ 35,400
Personnel FTE: 0.2 $ 6,000
Fringe 23% $ 1,380
Supplies $ 500
Travel $ 500
Indirect 41.4 $ 3,470
Total Itemized Budget $175,870


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 project cost $175,870
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 28,796
Total FY 2001 budget request $147,074
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 $103,253
% change from forecast 42.4%


Reason for change in estimated budget

The difference in estimated budget is due to actual anticipated expenses utilizing the four different categories listed in the proposal format. The original forecasted amount ( $103,253 ) was intended for Operations and Maintenance expenses only.


Reason for change in scope

The change in scope is due to adding funds for Planning and Design, Construction and Implementation and Monitoring and Evaluation phases. In my FY 2000 forecast I had only submitted for Operations and Maintenance funding.


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

2002 2003 2004 2005
Planning and design $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 0 $ 0
Construction/implementation $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000
Operations and maintenance $122,500 $125,000 $127,500 $130,000
Monitoring and evaluation $ 12,000 $ 12,250 $ 12,500 $ 12,750
Total Outyear Budgets $164,500 $167,250 $165,000 $167,750
 

Other Budget Explanation

Not applicable


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

CBFWA Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
2001
$175,870
Comment:

NWPPC Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000
2001
$175,870
Comment:
Completing project acquisitions and conducting management planning.

NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC Start of Year:
$154,722
FY06 NPCC Staff Preliminary:
$154,722
FY06 NPCC July Draft Start of Year:
$154,722
Sponsor (Warm Springs Tribe) Comments (Go to Original on NPCC Website):

Return to top of page