Return to Proposal Finder FY 2001 Ongoing Proposal 199901000

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget Summary

Reviews and Recommendations
No documents associated with this request


Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Mitigate Effects Of Runoff & Erosion On Salmonid Habitat In Pine Hollow and Jackknife
BPA Project Proposal Number 199901000
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Pine Hollow/Jackknife Watershed Council, c/o Sherman Soil and Water Conservation District
Business acronym (if appropriate) Sherman SWCD
 

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Jeff Clark
Mailing Address PO Box 405
City, State, Zip Moro, OR 97039
Phone 5415653216
Fax 5415653430
E-mail scswcd@transport.com
 
Manager of program authorizing this project Jeff Clark
 
Review Cycle FY 2001 Ongoing
Province Columbia Plateau
Subbasin John Day
 
Short Description Implement practices to reduce erosion and flooding, allowing natural recovery of riparian vegetation and channel type in Pine Hollow and Jackknife Canyons. Future phases will focus on replanting or protecting critical areas in the stream corridor.
Target Species


Project Location

[No information]


Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal


Biological Outcomes of this project: Improved upland forage and hydrologic function throughout uplands through better grazing management; improved riparian vegetation by protection of stream corridors from catastrophic flooding and overgrazing; increased fish, particularly steelhead, due to higher flows, cooler water, and functional habitat.
Biological Data: photopoints, some temperature data, PFC assessments


CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous


Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
1995 Begin temperature monitoring in Pine Hollow
1996 Begin steelhead spawning surveys in Pine Hollow
1997 Demonstration Phase implementation in Pine Hollow
1998 Begin upland practices in Pine Hollow
1998 Assess stream condition using PFC in Pine Hollow
1999 Jackknife Canyon and lands along John Day added to scope of project
1999 Completion of Decker Ranch Grazing Management Plan
1999 Begin upland assessment of Jackknife Canyon
1999 First CREP contract signed in Pine Hollow - protects and replants 13+ stream miles


Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information


Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. Assess Condition a- Jackknife Canyon grazing lands assessments 3 $ 2,700 x
b- Riparian/Channel assessments, projected to be completed 2 $ 0  
2. Mitigate Peak Flow Events a- Develop Range Management Plans 6 $ 3,000 x


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Planning and Design Phase

FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2002
$ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 5,000


Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
2. Mitigate Peak Flow Events - see also objectives 3, 4, 5 and 6 b- Install cross-fencing for better livestock distribution/utilization 5 $ 8,097  
c- Install spring developments for better livestock distribution/utilization 5 $ 9,097  
d- Reseed critical areas - areas in poor/fair condition $ 6,598  
e- Install field terracing and water and sediment control basins for control of runoff/erosion from grain fields $ 8,598  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Construction and Implementation Phase

FY 2005 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2002
$ 16,000 $ 22,000 $ 16,000 $ 22,000


Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Operations and Maintenance Phase

n/a or no information


Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
7. Monitor a- Track steelhead spawning activity through redd counts - ONGOING 10 $ 360  
b- Photopoints at all project sites, and photo monitoring of range condition at individual ranches. 12 $ 840  
c- Monitor temperature throughout summer 12 $ 965  
d- Reevaluate stream condition after five years using Proper Functioning Condition 12 $ 0  


Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information


Outyear Budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

FY 2005 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2002
$ 2,600 $ 2,500 $ 2,265 $ 2,165


Section 8. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2001 Cost
Personnel FTE: administration of subcontractor payments $ 600
Fringe $ 150
Subcontractor Pine Hollow/Jackknife Range Planner $ 4,950
Personnel FTE: 2 people, ~.38 FTE, BPA share 50% $ 5,000
Fringe $ 1,250
NEPA consultation with FWS, cultural resource survey $ 140
Other Cost-share to landowner @ 45%BPA $ 26,000
Personnel $ 288
Fringe $ 72
Supplies $ 125
Subcontractor $ 1,680
Total Itemized Budget $ 40,255


Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 project cost $ 40,255
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 13,157
Total FY 2001 budget request $ 27,098
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 $ 30,000
% change from forecast - 9.7%


Reason for change in estimated budget

Jackknife Canyon and John Day River lands have been added to the scope of the Watershed Council. The geographic area serviced through this watershed council has approximately doubled. The land uses and issues are nearly identical. The contracted range planner is currently conducting rangeland condition assessments on uplands in Jackknife Canyon and associated lands along the John Day River. By 2001, grazing management plans will be in preliminary stages, and high priority projects will be identified. The budgets for planning, implementation and monitoring are increased slightly due to this change in geographic scope. On the other hand, funds from FY1999 were carried over into FY2000. Most of this carryover is expected to linger into FY2001.


Reason for change in scope

Jackknife Canyon and John Day River lands have been added to the scope of the Watershed Council. The Geographic area serviced through this watershed council has approximately doubled. The land uses and issues are nearly identical. The contracted range planner is currently conducting rangeland condition assessments on uplands in Jackknife Canyon and associated lands along the John Day River. By 2001, grazing management plans will be in preliminary stages, and high priority projects will be identified. The budgets for planning, implementation and monitoring are increased slightly due to this change in geographic scope.


Cost Sharing

Not applicable
 

Outyear Budget Totals

2002 2003 2004 2005
Planning and design $ 5,000 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 0
Construction/implementation $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ 16,000 $ 16,000
Monitoring and evaluation $ 2,165 $ 2,500 $ 2,265 $ 2,600
Total Outyear Budgets $ 29,165 $ 26,000 $ 19,765 $ 18,600
 

Other Budget Explanation

Not applicable


Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

CBFWA Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
2001
$ 40,255
Comment:
Jackknife Canyon and John Day River lands have been added to the scope of the Watershed Council. The geographic area serviced through this watershed council has approximately doubled. The land uses and issues are nearly identical. The contracted range planner is currently conducting range land condition assessments on uplands in Jackknife Canyon and associated lands along the John Day River. By 2001, grazing management plans will be in preliminary stages, and high priority projects will be identified. The budgets for planning, implementation, and monitoring are increased slightly due to this change in geographic scope. On the other hand, funds from FY1999 were carried over into FY 2000. Most of this carryover is expected to linger into FY2001.

Proposed $13,157 in carry forward from FY 2000.


NWPPC Funding Recommendation Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000
2001
$ 32,865
Comment:
Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review. Project does not have carry-forward assumed by sponsor.

NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC Start of Year:
$ 23,500
FY06 NPCC Staff Preliminary:
$ 23,500
FY06 NPCC July Draft Start of Year:
$ 23,500
Sponsor (Sherman Soil & Water Conservation District) Comments (Go to Original on NPCC Website):

Return to top of page