Return to Proposal Finder FY 2001 Ongoing Proposal 200001100

Proposal Table of Contents

Additional Documents

Section 1. General Administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget Summary

Reviews and Recommendations
Title Type File Size File Date

Section 1. General Administrative Information

Title of Project Proposal Rock Creek Watershed Assessment and Restoration Project
BPA Project Proposal Number 200001100
Business name of agency, institution,
or organization requesting funding
Yakama Nation Fisheries Management Program
Business acronym (if appropriate) YN

Proposal contact person or principal investigator

Name Lynn, Hatcher, Yakama Nation Fisheries
Mailing Address P.O. Box 151, Fort Road
City, State, Zip Toppenish, WA 98948
Phone 5098656262
Fax 5098656293
Manager of program authorizing this project Lynn Hatcher
Review Cycle FY 2001 Ongoing
Province Columbia Plateau
Subbasin Rock Creek
Short Description Develop comprehensive plans and designs for habitat restoration work utilizing information from the watershed assessment information and other relevant monitoring data.
Target Species

Project Location

[No information]

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-Reported Relevant RPAs

Sponsor listed no RPAs for this project proposal

Relevant RPAs based upon NMFS & BPA Review

NMFS and BPA did not associate any reasonable and prudent alternatives with this project proposal

Biological Outcomes of this project: Restoration planning will prioritize projects and determine the most effective work to enhance conditions. Implementation of these restoration projects is expected to substantially increase critical habitat and water quality conditions.
Biological Data: Rock Creek Watershed Assessment (scheduled completion in 2000) Rock Creek Limiting Factors Analysis (2000) Water quality monitoring work (NRCS and Yakama Nation) Steelhead spawner surveys (WDFW, BLM)

CBFWA-Generated Information

Database Administrator notes on the history of this proposal form: None
Type of Project (assigned by CBFWA Analysts): anadromous

Section 2. Past Accomplishments

Year Accomplishment
2000 Rock Creek Watershed Assessment (scheduled for completion)

Section 3. Relationships to Other Projects

n/a or no information

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design Phase

Task-based Budget

Objective Task Duration in FYs Estimated 2001 cost Subcontractor
1. Plan and design effective habitat restoration work for the Rock Creek drainage a. Gather, review and evaluate all relevant information on Rock Creek to determine habitat deficiencies, water quality impairments, limiting factors and causal effects. $ 12,514  
b. Prioritize potential restoration work based on ability to improve conditions, expected benefits, feasibility and costs. $ 3,540  
c. Contact landowners and seek to obtain cooperation for restoration work. $ 1,770  
d. Develop and design restoration projects that will be biologically and cost effective. $ 20,420  
e. Conduct cultural resource surveys for restoration sites. $ 6,000  
f. Complete and submit necessary environmental permits for project work. NEPA compliance will be coordinated with BPA. $ 8,500  

Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information

Outyear Budgets for Planning and Design Phase

FY 2003 FY 2002
$ 21,000 $ 37,500

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information

Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information

Outyear Budgets for Construction and Implementation Phase

FY 2005 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2002
$ 74,000 $264,000 $137,000 $227,000

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information

Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information

Outyear Budgets for Operations and Maintenance Phase

FY 2005 FY 2003 FY 2004
$ 12,000 $ 8,500 $ 12,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Task-based Budget

n/a or no information

Outyear Objective-Based Budget

n/a or no information

Outyear Budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

FY 2005 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2002
$ 6,000 $ 11,000 $ 6,000 $ 9,000

Section 8. Estimated Budget Summary

Itemized Budget

Item Note FY 2001 Cost
Personnel FTE: 0.5 FTE for Watershed Restoration Biologist & 0.1 FTE for Bookkeeper 4 $ 26,200
Fringe Fringe at 25.3% rate $ 6,629
Supplies Office and field supplies (maps, paper, aerial photos, camera, film, copying costs, etc.) $ 2,350
Travel GSA vehicle for 6 months $ 2,670
Indirect Indirect Rate at 23.5% $ 8,895
NEPA Cultural Resource Surveys (80-120 hrs.) $ 6,000
Total Itemized Budget $ 52,744

Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 project cost $ 52,744
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA Funds $ 0
Total FY 2001 budget request $ 52,744
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 $289,000
% change from forecast -81.7%

Reason for change in estimated budget

Initially, the project sponsor expected to proceed immediately with restoration work in FY 2001. After additional evaluation, the project was determined to be more effective by using time in FY 2001 to thoroughly plan and design the work. This should result in better planning efforts and more effective implementation of restoration work.

Reason for change in scope

The scope of work has not changed, just an extension of the time frame to complete the project. Additional time for planning and designing restoration work should facilitate improved efficiency and better results from the work.

Cost Sharing

Not applicable

Outyear Budget Totals

2002 2003 2004 2005
Planning and design $ 37,500 $ 21,000 $ 0 $ 0
Construction/implementation $227,000 $264,000 $137,000 $ 74,000
Operations and maintenance $ 0 $ 8,500 $ 12,000 $ 12,000
Monitoring and evaluation $ 9,000 $ 11,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000
Total Outyear Budgets $273,500 $304,500 $155,000 $ 92,000

Other Budget Explanation

Not applicable

Reviews and Recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

This project has not yet been reviewed

Return to top of page