FY 2001 Action Plan proposal 200200100
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Okanogan River spring /summer chinook acclimation facility |
| Proposal ID | 200200100 |
| Organization | Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation (CCT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Chris Fisher |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 150 Nespelem, WA 99155 |
| Phone / email | 5094227427 / anadromous@colvilletribes.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | Jerry Marco |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Action Plan |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Cascade / Okanogan |
| Short description | This project is necessary to imprint Carson ancestry spring chinook to provide a fishery, reduce straying to nearby sub-watersheds and disperse adult summer chinook to utilize adequate habitat and strengthen the population. |
| Target species | Spring and summer chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 48.15 | -119.65 | Location and photograph of site is provided in Okanogan Watershed Land and Water Rights Acquisition Emergency Solicitation Proposal |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Perform a site survey (topography) of the proposed area | $0 | Yes | ||
| a. Site background research, point location. | 0.1 | $450 | Yes | |
| b. Survey topography of site | 0.1 | $1,920 | Yes | |
| c. Input and digitally connect points. | 0.1 | $780 | Yes | |
| 2. Develop the physical design of the acclimation facility. | $0 | Yes | ||
| a. Examine the topography and hydrology. | 0.5 | $5,800 | Yes | |
| b. Develop final design and specifications of the facility. | 1.0 | $11,600 | Yes | |
| 3. Construct the facility | $0 | Yes | ||
| a. Mobilize the construction crew and equipment. | 0.1 | $2,000 | Yes | |
| b. Construct the facility. | 1.5 | $45,000 | Yes | |
| c. Construction observation | 1.5 | $3,400 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| PIT tags | # of tags: Survey/design | $23,950 |
| Subcontractor | Construction/oversight | $47,000 |
| $70,950 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $70,950 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $70,950 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 2001-7)
ISRP Review (ISRP 2001-7)
Recommendation:
Not fundable under this solicitation
Not fundable under this solicitation
Date:
Jun 21, 2001
Jun 21, 2001
Comment:
Not fundable under this solicitation. The threats addressed by this proposal are not immediate and they do not have a concrete plan. This proposal could be better justified and submitted in the Columbia Cascade Provincial Review. Although the benefits are not immediate, this project may help in the long term. This too brief (sketchy) proposal to build an acclimation facility meets one of the criteria for funding under this solicitation: fish stock relocation and out planting. The project may be worthwhile in that it should reduce straying of returning Carson spring chinook into the Methow and Entiat basins that contain the endangered Methow composite stock. This would require long term O and M and M and E.Comment:
Comment: