FY 2001 Action Plan proposal 200106400
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 26011 Narrative | Narrative |
| Columbia Plateau: Yakima Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
| Columbia Plateau: Yakima Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Improve Stream Flow and Passage for Simcoe Creek Steelhead |
| Proposal ID | 200106400 |
| Organization | Yakama Nation (YN) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | David Lind |
| Mailing address | PO Box 151 Toppenish WA 98948 |
| Phone / email | 5098656262 / lind@yakama.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | Lynn Hatcher |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Action Plan |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Yakima |
| Short description | Maintain stream flows by providing replacement stock water during the summer, and facilitate upstream and downstream passage of steelhead by screening two canals and laddering two diversion dams. |
| Target species | Middle Columbia River summer steelhead |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 46.42 | -120.83 | 0.5 km east of Simcoe Creek at a point 2 km downstream from Hubbard Diversion (also see Fig. 1) |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Provide juvenile and adult steelhead passage at the two larger diversions (Hoptowit and Hubbard). | a. Design passage facilities for Hoptowit and Hubbard diversions. | 2 | $23,741 | Yes |
| 1. | b: Subcontract for passage construction. | 2 | $135,699 | Yes |
| 2. Replace summertime diversions with stock water wells. | a: Establish drilling sites. | 0.5 | $1,548 | |
| 2. | b: Subcontract for drilling. | 2.5 | $297,896 | Yes |
| 3: Use solar power to operate stock water wells wherever feasible. | a: Purchase solar pumps, pipe, valves and stock tanks. | 1 | $201,711 | |
| 3 | b: Subcontract for pump installation. | 2 | $106,548 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
| FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | $5,500 | $6,000 | $6,500 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 0.29 | $17,693 |
| Fringe | $3,538 | |
| Supplies | $167,500 | |
| Travel | $0 | |
| Indirect | $36,802 | |
| Capital | $0 | |
| NEPA | $0 | |
| PIT tags | $541,610 | |
| $767,143 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $767,143 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $767,143 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Fundable. A-list. This is a good proposal for elimination of passage barriers at two diversion dams, screening of two canals, and providing water wells to eliminate two diversions during summer low flow periods all on the Yakama Indian Reservation. The project would benefit steelhead during low flow periods. If implemented quickly, the benefits should be immediate. Permitting does not appear to be a problem for construction in FY01. This project may require funding of long-term O&M.Comment:
Comment: