FY 2001 Action Plan proposal 26018

Additional documents

TitleType
26018 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleFish Passage Assessment and Prioritization Program
Proposal ID26018
OrganizationWashington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, Operations Division (WA County, OR DLUT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameJanet Oatney
Mailing address1400 SW Walnut St. MS 51 Hillsboro, OR 97123
Phone / email5038467652 / janet_oatney@co.washington.or.us
Manager authorizing this projectGregory S. Miller, Operations Division Manager
Review cycleFY 2001 Action Plan
Province / SubbasinLower Columbia / Willamette
Short descriptionDevelop fish passage barrier assessment methodology for road / stream crossings, inventory county owned facilities, prioritize passage barriers to core habitat area for threatened and endangered fish species.
Target speciesWinter Steelhead, Cutthroat Trout
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
45.5017 -122.9958 Dairy Creek
45.5224 -123.0119 McKay Creek
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Finalize Barrier Assessment Methodology a. Write & review plan .5 $3,000
b. Develop inspection protocol .25 $1,500
2. Recruit temporary staff 1.0 (concurrent with objective 1) $0
3. Conduct Barrier Inventory in the Dairy - McKay Creek sub-basin 6.0 $36,000
4. Analyize data and prioritize barriers a. Incorporate & modifiy Clackamas Co. "Guide to Prioritizing Fish Passage Barriers" methodology .50 $3,000
b. Access outside water / habitat quality information from Unified Sewerage & ODFW .50 $7,700
c. Determine barrier signifigance & compare relative habitat gain by removal of barriers .50 $7,700
d. Develop ranked triage of barriers .50 $4,500
e. Report generation, information distribution 4.0 $24,100
f. Evaluate & Modify Program 1.0 $6,000
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003FY 2002FY 2004FY 2005
$20,000$20,000$20,000$20,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel FTE: (2) 0.5 temp FTE + .25 FTE Prog man & GIS $68,500
Fringe none for temps, benefits (no Overhead) for 2 perm. $19,900
Supplies safety & survey equipment, production costs $3,864
Subcontractor mileage $1,236
$93,500
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$93,500
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$93,500
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Washington County Road Fund safety & survey equipment, production & mileage $5,100 cash
Washington County Road Fund benefits $19,000 cash
Clackamas County Barrier Prioritization Program $0 in-kind
Multnomah County Database & GIS structure $0 in-kind
Forest Service Assessment Methodology $0 in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Not fundable under this solicitation
Date:
Jun 21, 2001

Comment:

Not fundable under this solicitation. The proposal does not meet the solicitation criteria. The proposal area is below the mainstem Columbia dams and the proposal does not demonstrate that there would be benefits to species that are impacted by this year's emergency operation. It does not offer immediate on-the-ground benefits. The proposal offers a logical assessment and prioritization process that would take advantage of low flow conditions to identify passage problems; the opportunity for such a safe and comprehensive inventory and evaluation may disappear next year. However, potential actions to improve passage would occur later.

One of the strengths of the proposed work is the linkages that have already been formed with other pertinent land and resource managers. This includes data sharing, utilization of in-place protocols and survey methods, and defined avenues for integrated decision-making. The budget looks appropriate to the proposed tasks. The Lower Columbia Province review is scheduled for the late fall and winter of 2001 and the proposal might be resubmitted for that solicitation.