FY 2001 Action Plan proposal 26018
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
26018 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Fish Passage Assessment and Prioritization Program |
Proposal ID | 26018 |
Organization | Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, Operations Division (WA County, OR DLUT) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Janet Oatney |
Mailing address | 1400 SW Walnut St. MS 51 Hillsboro, OR 97123 |
Phone / email | 5038467652 / janet_oatney@co.washington.or.us |
Manager authorizing this project | Gregory S. Miller, Operations Division Manager |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Action Plan |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Willamette |
Short description | Develop fish passage barrier assessment methodology for road / stream crossings, inventory county owned facilities, prioritize passage barriers to core habitat area for threatened and endangered fish species. |
Target species | Winter Steelhead, Cutthroat Trout |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
45.5017 | -122.9958 | Dairy Creek |
45.5224 | -123.0119 | McKay Creek |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Finalize Barrier Assessment Methodology | a. Write & review plan | .5 | $3,000 | |
b. Develop inspection protocol | .25 | $1,500 | ||
2. Recruit temporary staff | 1.0 (concurrent with objective 1) | $0 | ||
3. Conduct Barrier Inventory in the Dairy - McKay Creek sub-basin | 6.0 | $36,000 | ||
4. Analyize data and prioritize barriers | a. Incorporate & modifiy Clackamas Co. "Guide to Prioritizing Fish Passage Barriers" methodology | .50 | $3,000 | |
b. Access outside water / habitat quality information from Unified Sewerage & ODFW | .50 | $7,700 | ||
c. Determine barrier signifigance & compare relative habitat gain by removal of barriers | .50 | $7,700 | ||
d. Develop ranked triage of barriers | .50 | $4,500 | ||
e. Report generation, information distribution | 4.0 | $24,100 | ||
f. Evaluate & Modify Program | 1.0 | $6,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003 | FY 2002 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
---|---|---|---|
$20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: (2) 0.5 temp FTE + .25 FTE Prog man & GIS | $68,500 |
Fringe | none for temps, benefits (no Overhead) for 2 perm. | $19,900 |
Supplies | safety & survey equipment, production costs | $3,864 |
Subcontractor | mileage | $1,236 |
$93,500 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $93,500 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $93,500 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
Washington County Road Fund | safety & survey equipment, production & mileage | $5,100 | cash |
Washington County Road Fund | benefits | $19,000 | cash |
Clackamas County | Barrier Prioritization Program | $0 | in-kind |
Multnomah County | Database & GIS structure | $0 | in-kind |
Forest Service | Assessment Methodology | $0 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
ISRP Review (ISRP 2001-7)
Not fundable under this solicitation
Jun 21, 2001
Comment:
Not fundable under this solicitation. The proposal does not meet the solicitation criteria. The proposal area is below the mainstem Columbia dams and the proposal does not demonstrate that there would be benefits to species that are impacted by this year's emergency operation. It does not offer immediate on-the-ground benefits. The proposal offers a logical assessment and prioritization process that would take advantage of low flow conditions to identify passage problems; the opportunity for such a safe and comprehensive inventory and evaluation may disappear next year. However, potential actions to improve passage would occur later.One of the strengths of the proposed work is the linkages that have already been formed with other pertinent land and resource managers. This includes data sharing, utilization of in-place protocols and survey methods, and defined avenues for integrated decision-making. The budget looks appropriate to the proposed tasks. The Lower Columbia Province review is scheduled for the late fall and winter of 2001 and the proposal might be resubmitted for that solicitation.