FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23083
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
23083 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Rear and Release 1.0 million spring chinook at Ringold Springs Hatchery |
Proposal ID | 23083 |
Organization | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Douglas W. Dompier |
Mailing address | 729 N.E. Oregon suite 200 Portland, OR 97232 |
Phone / email | 5037311292 / domd@critfc.org |
Manager authorizing this project | Paul Lumley |
Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / |
Short description | Rear and release 1.0 million 1999 spring chinook obtained from Leavenworth Hatchery Complex. Returning adults will be used in sport fishery and reintroduction to natural habitat such as in the Walla Walla River. |
Target species | Spring Chinook |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
47.5589 | -120.6706 | Leavenworth Hatchery |
46.5219 | -119.2685 | Ringold Springs Hatchery |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2004 |
---|
$25,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 1.2 | $58,566 |
Fringe | $13,161 | |
Supplies | $102,857 | |
Travel | $1,000 | |
Indirect | $40,000 | |
Capital | $20,000 | |
$235,584 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $235,584 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $235,584 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
Mitchell Act | staff | $114,349 | cash |
USFWS | marking | $25,000 | cash |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal to rear and release one million spring chinook does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.Comment:
There is a management dispute regarding the listed stock of fish in the Methow River.