FY 2002 Mountain Snake proposal 200002800

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleEvaluate Status of Pacific Lamprey in the Clearwater River Drainage, Idaho
Proposal ID200002800
OrganizationIdaho Department of Fish and Game and Idaho Office of Species Conservation (IDFG/IOSC)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameTim Cochnauer
Mailing address1540 WARNER AVE. LEWISTON, ID 83501
Phone / email2087995010 / tcochnau@idfg.state.id.us
Manager authorizing this projectCal Groen
Review cycleMountain Snake
Province / SubbasinMountain Snake / Clearwater
Short descriptionTo determine distribution, population status, and life history information for Pacific Lamprey in the Clearwater River subbasin.
Target speciesPacific Lamprey (Lampetra tridentata)
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
45.83 -115.91 South Fork Clearwater River Drainage
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
2000 A total of 262 juvenile Pacific lamprey were captured during the 2000 field season. Preliminary findings indicate Pacific lamprey juveniles, while present, are not numerous or widely distributed.
2000 Lateral scour pool with sand/silt substrate was the most widely used habitat for ammocoetes.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9402600 CTUIR Pacific Lamprey Research and Restoration Project Coordination of applicable information regarding Pacific lamprey larval life history.
8909800 Idaho Supplementation Studies Collects ammocoetes and macrothalmia in migrant traps.
9107300 Idaho Natural Production Monitoring and Evaluation Provides incidential observations.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
Objective 1. Determine life history characteristics of ammocoetes and macrothalmia. Task 1.1 Determine age, size, and timing of outmigrant juvenile lamprey by collecting and measuring captured fish in downstream migrant traps on Red, American and Crooked rivers 1 $7,300
Task 1.2 Determine relative abundance of outmigrants by marking juveniles at capture locations upstream of traps. 1 $7,300
Task 1.3 Determine age distribution and density of ammocoets and estimate population abundance by capturing lamprey utilizing electroshocking techniques. 1 $7,300
Task 1.4 Coordinate with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington Dept. of Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service and other personnel working at mainstem Snake River and Columbian dams for information on any marked juvenile outmigrants. 1 $7,300
Objective 2.Determine habitat requirements of Pacific Lamprey Task 2.1 At individual capture locations, as in Task 1.3, characterize habitat type by measuring substrate type, substrate temperature, water depth, water velocity, gradient, light intensity, and instream cover. 1 $57,900
Task 2.2 Upon random encounter of any adult Pacific lamprey, measure parameters as described in Task 2.1. 1 $7,300
Objective 3.Determine distribution of Pacifc Lamprey in Clearwater River drainage. Task 3.1 Electoshock potential habitat types in selected tributaries in the Clearwater River subbasin to expand knowledge of distribution. 1 $42,850
Task 3.2 Provide distribution on GIS overlays. 1 $7,300 Yes
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Objective 1: Determine distribution of Pacific lamprey in Clearwater River drainage 3 4 $200,000
Objective 2: Develop GIS overlays for Pacific lamprey distribution in the Clearwater River drainage and habitat restoration and preservation management guidelines for land management agencies. 3 5 $180,000
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005
$160,000$160,000$60,000

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2002 cost
Personnel FTE: Graduate student, seasonal crew, biologist $50,000
Fringe $18,250
Supplies Field equipment, supplies, per diem, etc. $32,000
Travel Coordination meetings; professional society $2,000
Indirect $37,300
Subcontractor University of Idaho $5,000
$144,550
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost$144,550
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2002 budget request$144,550
FY 2002 forecast from 2001$97,800
% change from forecast47.8%
Reason for change in estimated budget

Increases in project budget for personnel are due to legislative mandate cost of living increases ,and more biologist time to insure timely and comprehensive completion of annual tasks. The project will move to other drainages within the Clearwater River subbasin, requiring more travel and logistical support.

Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Idaho Department of Fish and Game Supervision, office facilities, field assistance $15,000 in-kind
Nez Perce National Forest field assistance $5,000 in-kind
Bureau of Land Management Field assistance $5,000 in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fundable - no response required
Date:
Sep 28, 2001

Comment:

Fundable. No response needed. The methods, which are reasonably well detailed, are aimed at evaluation of background information for various life history stages of the animal. This proposal addresses a need for information in a systematic way. It provides good scientific/technical background and justification, and appears to be well coordinated with other projects. The proposal requests "full" ($160K) funding through FY 04 and then reduced funding for FY05. However, this study should be complete in no more than three field seasons (00 - 02) with some wrap-up on the end. At the presentation it was noted that a UI grad student will be on the project. If they have not yet started it might be reasonable to go another year, but this is approaching a point where the Council and CBFWA may want to consider if the project is too expensive for the information gained.
Recommendation:
High Priority
Date:
Nov 30, 2001

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Dec 21, 2001

Comment:

Fundable. No response was requested. The methods, which are reasonably well detailed, are aimed at evaluation of background information for various life history stages of the animal. This proposal addresses a need for information in a systematic way. It provides good scientific/technical background and justification, and appears to be well coordinated with other projects. The proposal requests "full" ($160K) funding through FY 04 and then reduced funding for FY05. However, this study should be complete in no more than three field seasons (00 - 02) with some wrap-up on the end. At the presentation it was noted that a UI grad student will be on the project. If they have not yet started it might be reasonable to go another year, but this is approaching a point where the Council and CBFWA may want to consider if the project is too expensive for the information gained.
Recommendation:
Date:
Feb 1, 2002

Comment:

Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESU
None for RPA ESUs. But still important basic research for resident fish.

Comments
No direct connection to FCRPS BiOp, but necessary work on an anadromous species that is not currently listed, but has the potential to be.

Already ESA Req? No

Biop? No


Recommendation:
A
Date:
Feb 11, 2002

Comment:

BPA RPA RPM:
--

NMFS RPA/USFWS RPM:
--


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Apr 19, 2002

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Jun 13, 2002

Comment:

Fund
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

Need to check for scope change - follow up.
Recommendation:
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

Budget increase due to increased field time and extensive genetic analysis of Pacific lamprey entering Snake River.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$82,913 $82,913 $82,913

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website