FY 2000 proposal 20509
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Hellsgate Big Game Winter Range Umbrella Project |
Proposal ID | 20509 |
Organization | Colville Confederated Tribes (CCT) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Steven L. Judd |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 150 Nespelem, WA 99155 |
Phone / email | 5096342117 / |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 2000 |
Province / Subbasin | Inter-Mountain / Columbia Upper |
Short description | Umbrella project to protect, mitigate, enhance and evaluate wildlife habitats and species for partial mitigation for losses to wildlife resulting from Grand Coulee and Chief Joseph Dams. |
Target species | Mule deer, sharp-tailed and blue grouse, mourning dove, Lewis and downy woodpecker, yellow warbler, bobcat, mink, bald eagle, and spotted sandpiper. |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
1993 |
Acquired W.K. property-4814 ac. |
1995 |
Acquired H.K. property-4800 ac. |
1995 |
Acquired Berg property-6300 ac. |
1997 |
Acquired Nespelem Bend property-517 ac. |
1997 |
Acquired Redford Canyon property-221 ac. |
1998 |
Acquired Friedlander property-60 ac. |
1998 |
Acquired Hinman property-770 ac. |
1998 |
Acquired Sand Hills property-1030 ac. |
1998 |
Conducted baseline HEP's (1993-1998) on acquisitions |
1998 |
Implemented O & M on acquisitions (1993-1998) |
1998 |
Implemented M & E on acquisitions (1993-1998) |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
9506700 |
CCT Performance Contract for Continuing Acquisition |
|
20509 |
Hellsgate Big Game Winter Range Wildlife Mitigation Umbrella Project |
|
9204800 |
Hellsgate Big Game Winter Range Operation and Maintenance Project |
|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
Personnel |
See Individual proposals under this section for costs. |
$0 |
Fringe |
|
$0 |
Supplies |
|
$0 |
| $0 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost | $0 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2000 budget request | $0 |
FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
See Hellsgate O&M Project No. 9204800 for specifics. We receive cost sharing periodically on a project by project basis from agencies such as BIA & NRCS. BIA has the responsibility for major fire control efforts on Hellsgate Project lands |
|
$0 |
unknown |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Note: Above items 5 through 7 are on going and costs are to be dtermined. Breakdown of negotiations with landowners could casue schedule changes and delays. Catastrophic events such as wildfires could cause setbacks in meeting time lines on objectives.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
NA - Umbrella Proposal
Date:
Jun 15, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
NA - Umbrella Proposal
Comments:
Reviewers commented on the inadequacy of this umbrella proposal. Land acquisition is extremely important in the region but the umbrella was not informative. The authors should supply a history of their efforts not just of funding. They should provide more details on their objectives. This umbrella proposal, intended to be an overall explanation of why a set of projects needs to be done, falls short in a number of ways. First is the relationship between past and proposed land acquisitions to each other. Do they tend to form continuous or connected parcels or are they essentially all independent of each other? The former is preferred. Second, whether or not there are any potential benefits to other organisms by the proposed acquisitions is not even considered. What parcels are targeted for acquisition and why and how they relate to the overall goals of the Fish and Wildlife Program are not discussed. In general, the umbrella was not useful.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Not Reviewed
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Not reviewed