FY07-09 proposal 198335003
Jump to Reviews and Recommendations
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery M&E |
Proposal ID | 198335003 |
Organization | Nez Perce Tribe |
Short description | This monitoring and evaluation (M&E) plan describes the implementation of a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation program for Phase 1 of Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery (NPTH). |
Information transfer | Findings from all monitoring and evaluation activities will be communicated regularily to resource managers through several formats. Hatchery releases, tagging information, and tag recoveries will be reported regularily to regional data bases. Work plans, progress reports, and annual reports will be distributed and a comanager review will be held annually. This information will be used to improve measurements, analyses, and in adaptive management of NPTH. |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Contacts
Contact | Organization | |
---|---|---|
Form submitter | ||
Sherman Sprague | Nez Perce Tribe | shermans@nezperce.org |
All assigned contacts | ||
Bill Arnsberg | Nez Perce Tribe | billa@nezperce.org |
Sherman Sprague | Nez Perce Tribe | shermans@nezperce.org |
Sherman Sprague | Nez Perce Tribe | shermans@nezperce.org |
Section 2. Locations
Province / subbasin: Mountain Snake / Clearwater
Latitude | Longitude | Waterbody | Description |
---|---|---|---|
46.5199 | 116.6612 | Clearwater | Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery |
46.4335 | 116.9647 | Clearwater | Mouth Clearwater River to South/Middle Fork Stream Survey |
46.2303 | 116.8532 | Lapwai Cr. | Sweetwater Springs Rearing |
46.44380 | 116 .81505 | Lapwai Creek | North Lapwai Valley -Acclimation |
46.3718 | 116.1696 | Lolo Creek | Lolo Creek Mouth |
46.29399 | 115.97498 | Lolo Creek | Lolo Creek Juvenile Screw Trap Site and Adult spring Chinook weir site |
46.1462 | 115.9799 | M.F. Clearwater | Middle Fork Clearwater River Survey area |
46.04528 | 115.29673 | Meadow Creek | Meadow Creek Juvenile Screw Trap Site |
46.04541 | 115.29650 | Meadow Creek | Meadow Creek Mouth |
45.82880 | 115.61491 | Newsome Creek | Newsome Creek Juvenile Screw Trap Site and Adult spring Chinook weir site. |
45.82852 | 115.61537 | Newsome Creek | Newsome CreekCreek Mouth |
45.80697 | 115.63092 | Newsome Creek | Newsome Creek Acclimation Facility |
46.1453 | 115.9815 | S.F. Clearwater | South Fork Clearwater River Survey area |
46.0323 | 115.9753 | S.F. Clearwater | South Fork Clearwater River, Lukes Gulch acclimation |
46.09383 | 115.53960 | Selway | Selway River, Cedar Flats Acclimation |
46.1406 | 115.5973 | Selway | Mouth of Selway River to Selway Fall, survey area |
46.39717 | 115.64775 | Yoosa Creek | Yoosa/Camp Creek Acclimation Facility |
46.46461 | 116.23424 | Orofino Field Office3404 Hwy 12, Orofino, ID. 83544 |
Section 3. Focal species
primary: Chinook Snake River Fall ESUprimary: Chinook Snake River Spring/Summer ESU
secondary: Coho Unspecified Population
secondary: Pacific Lamprey
secondary: Steelhead Snake River ESU
secondary: Bull Trout
Additional:
Section 4. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishments |
---|---|
2005 | Completion of the Draft Composite Annual Report January 1993 – December 2000. Completed a 2002 draft Fall Chinook NPTH M&E Annual Report and assist in the 2004 run-reconstruction. Collected M&E data on hatchery and natural spring and fall Chinook salmon. |
2004 | Completion of the draft 2001 Annual Report. Started M&E of first NPTH spring Chinook releases. Continued spring Chinook adult return monitoring and broodstock collection. Evaluation of first fall Chinook jack returns, assisted in 2003 run reconstruction. |
2003 | Started NPTH broodstock collection. Collected baseline data in study streams, monitored hatchery outplanted spring chinook (parr densities, juvenile emigration, spawning ground surveys, adult return-weir operations). Monitored first fall Chinook releases. |
2002 | Monitored natural fall chinook life history characteristics. Collected baseline data in study streams and monitored hatchery outplanted spring chinook (parr densities, juvenile emigration, spawning ground surveys, and adult return-weir operations). |
2001 | Collected baseline data in study streams and monitored hatchery outplanted spring chinook (parr densities, juvenile emigration, spawning ground surveys, and adult return-weir operations) |
2000 | Completion of the NPTH: Action Plan. Collected baseline data in study streams and monitored hatchery outplanted spring chinook (parr densities, juvenile emigration, spawning ground surveys, and adult return-weir operations) |
1999 | NPTH Benefit Risk Analysis. Collected baseline data in study streams and monitored hatchery outplanted spring chinook (parr densities, juvenile emigration, spawning ground surveys, and adult return-weir operations). |
1998 | Collected baseline data in study streams and monitored hatchery outplanted spring chinook (parr densities, juvenile emigration, spawning ground surveys, and adult return-weir operations) |
1997 | Final EIS for NPTH completed. Results of Meadow Creek Fish Trapping for the 1995 Migratory Year. Stream Conditions and Salmonid Abundance - Meadow Creek. Aerial Photographs of Meadow Creek. HGMP produced. Newsome Creek Adult Weir initiated. |
1996 | Completion of the Monitoring and Evaluation Plan for the Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery. Initiated adult escapement analysis (Lolo Creek). Collected baselind data in study streams (parr densities, juvenile emigration, spawning ground surveys). |
1995 | Supplement to the Master Plan developed. Habitat condition report. Collected baselind data in study streams (parr densities, juvenile emigration, spawning ground surveys) and monitored hatchery outplanted spring chinook. |
1994 | Results of Meadow Creek Fish Trapping, Fall 1993. Collected baseline data in study streams and monitored hatchery outplanted spring chinook. |
1993 | Initiated ongoing baseline data (parr densities, juvenile emigration, spawning ground surveys). |
Section 5. Relationships to other projects
Funding source | Related ID | Related title | Relationship |
---|---|---|---|
BPA | 198335000 | Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery O&M | This project provides the monitoring and evaluation for the NPTH supplementation program. |
BPA | 198201301 | Coded Wire Tag - PSMFC | CWT data are collected as part of the Adult Surveys and provided to the regional data base. The regional data base is accessed to obtain data on CWT recoveries outside by other programs. |
BPA | 199607700 | Clearwater Watershed Impl - Np | A watershed improvement project that complements the NPTH supplementation project with habitat improvements and surveys located in the same drainages. The NPTH M & E measures the performance of chinook in these drainages. |
BPA | 198909800 | Salmon Studies Id Rvrs IDFC | Collects necessary data in reference stream to compare with NPTH program treatment stream). |
BPA | 198909802 | Salmon Studies Id Rvrs NPT | Relies on this project (1983350003) for the collection of ISS data in Newsome, Lolo and Eldorado Creeks. |
PCSRF - Idaho | 031 04 CW | Lolo Creek Passage Restoration | This project is designed to imporve adult passage. The spawning ground surveys of NPTH M&E monitors the results |
BPA | 199607702 | Lolo Creek Watershed | A watershed improvement project that complements the NPTH supplementation project with habitat improvements and surveys located in the same drainages. The NPTH M & E measures the performance of chinook in these drainages. |
BPA | 200003500 | Rehabilitate Newsome Creek - S | A watershed improvement project that complements the NPTH supplementation project with habitat improvements and surveys located in the same drainages. The NPTH M & E measures the performance of chinook in these drainages. |
BPA | 200206000 | Nez Perce Harvest Monitoring | This harvest project complements NPTH supplementation project by providing harvest information on NPTH fish. Objective 4. |
Other: Lower Snake River Comp. Plan | [no entry] | LSRCP Harvest | This harvest project complements NPTH supplementation project by providing harvest information on NPTH fish. Objective 4. |
BPA | 198909801 | Salmon Studies Id Rvrs USFWS | Cooperatively collect comparable data in all major Chinook salmon producing streams in the Clearwater subbasin. |
BPA | 199102900 | Post-Release Survival of Fall Chinook | Project cooperation, monitoring and evaluation of fall Chinook, transport/spill studies using PIT tags and associated adult returns. |
BPA | 199403300 | Fish Passage Center | They run the Pit tag detection program at mainstem dams that provides fall chinook PIT tag detection data to regional data base and they evaluate emigration timing and survivals through the hydro system. |
Other: US vs Oregon TAC | [no entry] | Technical Advisory Committee | Cooperatively work with this US vs Oregon group to build Lower Granite Dam capture, spawning database and run reconstruction for fall chinook. |
BPA | 200303600 | CBFWA Monitor/Eval Program | The project is an integral part of the Collaborative System-wide Monitoring and Evaluation Program. |
Other: US Army Corps | W912EF-05-P-005 | Fall Chinook Transport/Spill Studies | Project staff and equipment are shared to evaluate natural and hatchery fall chinook survivals in cooperative transport/spill evaluations. |
BPA | 199801005 | Pittsburg Landing Fall Chinook | Work cooperatively to monitor juvenile emigration timing, growth rates, adult returns, and hatchery contribution to natural production. |
BPA | 199801004 | M&E Snake R. Fall Ch Spawning | Work cooperatively to monitor juvenile survivals, growth rates, emigration timing, and adult returns from Lyons Ferry Hatchery fall chinook releases on the Snake and Clearwater rivers. |
Other: Various | [no entry] | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | Cooperate/share PIT tag , CWT, fish and habitat data with PSMFC. |
Section 6. Biological objectives
Biological objectives | Full description | Associated subbasin plan | Strategy |
---|---|---|---|
Harvest Management | Determine how harvest opportunities on spring, early-fall, and fall chinook salmon can be optimized for tribal and non-tribal anglears within Nez Perce Treaty lands | Clearwater | Objective C, Strategy C.3. Objective D, Strategy D.1 |
Hatchery Product Performance | Determine if program targets for contribution rate of hatchery fish are being achieved and can be improved | Clearwater | Objective C, strategy C.2 Objective D, strategies D.1, D.4, and D.5 |
Information Transfer | Effectivel communicate monitoring and evaluation approach and findings to resource managers. | Clearwater | Objective C, Strategy 1. Objective D, Strategy 5 |
Interactions | Estimate ecological and genetic impacts to other fish populations | Clearwater | Objective C. StrategyC.2 |
Natural Production Response | Determine the increases in natural production that results from supplementation of chinook salmon in the Clearwater River subbasin, and relate them to limiting factors | Clearwater | Objective A, strategies A.1 and A.2; Objective B, strategy 4 |
Section 7. Work elements (coming back to this)
Work element name | Work element title | Description | Start date | End date | Est budget |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Manage and Administer Projects | Develop Annual Statement of Work | Prepare a Statement of Work and budget for the contract years 2007 through 2009 that identifies research objectives and tasks. The first draft will be available for technical review by 15 September prior to the funding year, and will be submitted to BPA by 1 October of the same year. Attend or present results at regional conferences, attend technical workshops, and attend training as required. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $304,707 |
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
Produce Annual Report | Produce 2006 - 2007 Annual Report | Prepare annual reports that documents NPTH Spring Chinook and Fall Chinook research activities. This will include adult return information (spawning surveys) and juvenile production and emigration through spring of 2009. Final drafts will be submitted to the BPA by May 1 each year. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $426,588 |
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
Produce Status Report | Produce Quarterly Status Reports and Summary Reports | Provide quarterly status reports to BPA (due dates 4/15, 7/15, 10/15, and 12/31 each year) and provide summary reports to BPA, cooperative State and Federal agencies that will describe brief results of population status or supplementation activities that has occurred on a regular basis without detailed interpretation. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $548,470 |
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
Produce Environmental Compliance Documentation | ESA permits and reports, BioOp. Reports. | Acquire necessary permits and other authorizations to implement the project. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $121,882 |
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
Other | Produce Pisces Status Report - Project Reports | Produce quarterly status reports in PISCES (due dates 4/15, 7/15, 10/15, and 12/31 for 2007 thru 2009. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $60,941 |
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
Coordination | Coordinate Program, NPTH AOP, Inter/Intra Agencies | Assist the Production Department with the development of the NPTH annual operation plan. Attend relevant inter- and intra-agency meetings as required to coordinate activities and share project information. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $487,529 |
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
Mark/Tag Animals | Mark hatchery and wild Chinook salmon and PIT tag | Mark hatchery-reared chinook salmon with a unique mark so they can be detected as smolts and adults (currently 625K spring chinook coded wire tagged, and 1 million fall chinook 600K coded wire tagged and 400K coded wire tagged plus ad-clipped). PIT tags will be used in a subsample of hatchery fish (31K spring chinook and 12K fall chinook) before release and in wild fish (12K spring chinook and 8K fall chinook) captured in treatment streams. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $975,058 |
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
Install Fish Monitoring Equipment | Install & Remove Screw Traps and Adult Weirs | Install screw traps in NPTH treatment streams to capture emigrating juvenile spring Chinook salmon. Remove traps at the end of emigration period or when ice problems prohibits their use. They will be removed when spawning is complete | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $365,647 |
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data | Collect Data for Monitoring and Evaluating Adult Chinook Salmon | Collect monitoring data pertaining to NPTH Supplementation activities. This mainly covers field activities to collect data from spring and fall hatchery and wild Chinook. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $1,828,235 |
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
Submit/Acquire Data | Transferring/uploading Data | Uploading PIT tag data files and coded wire tagging data files | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $182,823 |
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
Analyze/Interpret Data | Analyze/Interpret Data Generated by Field Activities | Analyze data and organize results into tables, figures, and text format for use in technical reports, scientific, and management forums. | 1/1/2007 | 12/31/2009 | $792,235 |
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
Section 8. Budgets
Itemized estimated budget
Item | Note | FY07 | FY08 | FY09 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Personnel | 12 full time, 14 part time, 4 admin support | $829,345 | $854,422 | $880,096 |
Fringe Benefits | 12 full time, 14 part time, 4 admin support | $267,921 | $269,773 | $271,664 |
Supplies | office and field materials | $141,294 | $141,294 | $141,294 |
Travel | field crew operations, project coordination and management | $33,411 | $33,411 | $33,411 |
Capital Equipment | Coded Wire Tags, PIT Tags, and CWT tagging costs | $285,293 | $285,293 | $285,293 |
Overhead | 29.65% Indirect Rate | $377,139 | $385,124 | $393,297 |
Other | Sub-contracts | $61,780 | $61,780 | $61,780 |
Totals | $1,996,183 | $2,031,097 | $2,066,835 |
Total estimated FY 2007-2009 budgets
Total itemized budget: | $6,094,115 |
Total work element budget: | $6,094,115 |
Cost sharing
Funding source/org | Item or service provided | FY 07 est value ($) | FY 08 est value ($) | FY 09 est value ($) | Cash or in-kind? | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[organization left blank] | [provision left blank] | $0 | $0 | $0 | Cash | Confirmed |
BLM | Fall chinook redd surveys | $9,800 | $9,800 | $9,800 | Cash | Under Review |
US Army CORPS of Engineers | Additional staff and equipment to capture additional natural fall chinook for PIT tagging. | $72,691 | $74,969 | $77,182 | Cash | Under Review |
Totals | $82,491 | $84,769 | $86,982 |
Section 9. Project future
FY 2010 estimated budget: $2,093,238 FY 2011 estimated budget: $2,093,238 |
Comments: Assumes a 3% increase in salaries and no inflation. |
Future O&M costs: The first fish releases from the Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery occurred in 2003 for fall chinook and 2004 for spring chinook. Monitoring and evaluation of the Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery is expected to cover 15 to 20 years and is designed to be adaptively managed to answer critical uncertainties and nine main management questions over this time period. Rough estimates for annual operation from 2011 through 2024 would be $2,120,433 with an annual inflationary rate of 2 percent. If program objectives can be achieved, Phase II (full implementation) of NPTH may be implemented.
Termination date: 2019 - 2024
Comments: The Monitoring and Evaluation project is designed to sample fish populations in the main-stem Clearwater River and its tributaries over the next 15 to 20 years. If/when the critical uncertainties and the main management questions are answered, a reduction in M&E activities should occur. An expansion may occur if full implementation of the Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery is approved.
Final deliverables: The final deliverables of the project include answers to the critical uncertainties described in Steward (1996) and the following nine main management questions. • Can Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery produce adequate return rates to achieve program objectives? • Do the NATURES rearing components make enough difference in post-release survival and return rates to warrant the added limitations compared to conventional hatcheries? • Can Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery strategies be improved to achieve program goals more rapidly? • Can self-sustaining natural populations be established from hatchery fish? • Can we determine how to adjust supplementation rates as natural populations rebuild? • Does the NPTH program foster genetic adaptation in target populations? • Are intra- and inter-species specific abundance and behaviors altered by the NPTH program? • Can harvest rate and gear type be predictively managed to optimize NPTH operation? • Can adult return be accurately predicted for NPTH streams?
Section 10. Narrative and other documents
Reviews and recommendations
FY07 budget | FY08 budget | FY09 budget | Total budget | Type | Category | Recommendation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPCC FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Oct 23, 2006) [full Council recs] | ||||||
$1,900,000 | $1,900,000 | $1,900,000 | $5,700,000 | Expense | ProvinceExpense | Fund |
NPCC DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Sep 15, 2006) [full Council recs] | ||||||
$1,900,000 | $1,900,000 | $1,900,000 | $0 | ProvinceExpense |
ISRP PRELIMINARY REVIEW (Jun 2, 2006)
Recommendation: Fundable
NPCC comments: Technical and scientific background: This is a thorough and well-written proposal that documents the long history of the NPTH project including (somewhat between the lines!) the long interaction and dialogue between the ISRP and the project. The current proposal accurately reflects many of the conclusions reached during previous reviews and is focused on implementing and monitoring Phase 1 of the three-phased, 20+ year project. Phase 1 is expected to take approximately 5 years; however, specific adult returns (i.e., benchmarks or biological triggers) have to be achieved to move the project into Phase II. Sponsors provide substantial detail throughout the proposal and in the attached M&E Action Plan describing specific tasks and performance measures. It would appear from this well-crafted proposal that the years of dialogue have paid off and that the systematic approach outlined in the proposal and M&E action plan are likely to yield much needed information on supplementation effects and results. Relationships to other projects are well described. This is a very expensive ($2 million/yr) effort to assess the performance of NATURES rearing and of this supplementation program. Prior ISRP comments specified that this M&E be done commensurate with a Phase 1 production level; however, it is difficult at this time to tease out if there should be any differences for M&E between the two phases. Objectives, tasks, and M&E are well described including a detailed description of uncertainties, assumptions, and hypotheses.
ISRP FINAL REVIEW (Aug 31, 2006)
Recommendation: Fundable
NPCC comments: Technical and scientific background: This is a thorough and well-written proposal that documents the long history of the NPTH project including (somewhat between the lines!) the long interaction and dialogue between the ISRP and the project. The current proposal accurately reflects many of the conclusions reached during previous reviews and is focused on implementing and monitoring Phase 1 of the three-phased, 20+ year project. Phase 1 is expected to take approximately 5 years; however, specific adult returns (i.e., benchmarks or biological triggers) have to be achieved to move the project into Phase II. Sponsors provide substantial detail throughout the proposal and in the attached M&E Action Plan describing specific tasks and performance measures. It would appear from this well-crafted proposal that the years of dialogue have paid off and that the systematic approach outlined in the proposal and M&E action plan are likely to yield much needed information on supplementation effects and results. Relationships to other projects are well described. This is a very expensive ($2 million/yr) effort to assess the performance of NATURES rearing and of this supplementation program. Prior ISRP comments specified that this M&E be done commensurate with a Phase 1 production level; however, it is difficult at this time to tease out if there should be any differences for M&E between the two phases. Objectives, tasks, and M&E are well described including a detailed description of uncertainties, assumptions, and hypotheses.