FY07-09 proposal 200731300
Jump to Reviews and Recommendations
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Expanded Acquisition and Display of Fish (Initially Anadromous Salmonids) Harvest Data in the StreamNet Database |
| Proposal ID | 200731300 |
| Organization | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (PSMFC) |
| Short description | Locate data sources for marine and freshwater sport and commercial harvests, including hatchery contribution rates to fisheries and percentages of hatchery fish straying onto natural spawning grounds. Build a comprehensive database schema to store data. |
| Information transfer | Data compiled by this project will be incorporated into the StreamNet database and made available via the StreamNet on-line query system at http://www.streamnet.org. |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Contacts
| Contact | Organization | |
|---|---|---|
| Form submitter | ||
| Mike Banach | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | mike_banach@psmfc.org |
| All assigned contacts | ||
| Bruce Schmidt | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | bruce_schmidt@psmfc.org |
| Bruce Schmidt | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | bruce_schmidt@psmfc.org |
Section 2. Locations
Province / subbasin: Mainstem/Systemwide / Systemwide
| Latitude | Longitude | Waterbody | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range of anadromous fishes in the Columbia River basin. | |||
| Marine waters of the state. | |||
| Marine waters of the state. |
Section 3. Focal species
primary: All Anadromous Salmonidssecondary: All Anadromous Fish
secondary: Resident Fish
Section 4. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishments |
|---|
Section 5. Relationships to other projects
| Funding source | Related ID | Related title | Relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| BPA | 198810804 | Streamnet (CIS/NED) | This project will provide extra effort needed to expand the harvest data available from StreamNet. |
Section 6. Biological objectives
| Biological objectives | Full description | Associated subbasin plan | Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monitor harvest & hatchery contributions | Research historical harvest management data such as exploitation rates by stock and hatchery contribution rates to fisheries, build and maintain a database schema to store the information, and provide access to information via world wide web. | Hood | 1) ... estimate both the harvest and exploitation rate of coded wire and PIT tagged experimental hatchery groups; |
| Monitor Columbia R. harvest data | Research historical harvest management data such as exploitation rates by stock and hatchery contribution rates to fisheries, build and maintain a database schema to store the information, and provide access to information via world wide web. | Klickitat | Strategy 6b. Update and maintain all Klickitat-related databases with historical and current harvest data. |
| Monitor hatchery fraction on spawning grounds | Research historical harvest management data such as exploitation rates by stock and hatchery contribution rates to fisheries, build and maintain a database schema to store the information, and provide access to information via world wide web. | Salmon | Key performance measure for abundance: hatchery fraction (Percent of fish on spawning ground that originated from hatchery and strayed to natural spawning ground. Determined from carcass or weir sampling.) |
Section 7. Work elements (coming back to this)
| Work element name | Work element title | Description | Start date | End date | Est budget |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Submit/Acquire Data | Acquire, standardize and georeference (to degree possible) data on the contribution of hatchery fish to harvest | A biologist/data compiler will work with the management agencies in the basin to locate and then obtain data on hatchery contribution to harvest of anadromous hatchery fish in the variety of marine and freshwater sport and commercial fisheries. These data will be compiled and submitted to the StreamNet database. | 10/1/2006 | 9/30/2010 | $284,270 |
|
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
| Submit/Acquire Data | Acquire, standardize and georeference to the degree possible data on numbers of fish harvested | Agency partners will work within their agencies to locate, acquire, standardize and georeference data on the sport and commercial harvest of salmonids in marine and fresh waters. Ths will add a significant amount of harvest data to the StreamNet database. Initial work will focus on determining location and availability of data, which are widely scattered, and then emphasis will shift to data acquisition. | 10/1/2006 | 9/30/2010 | $133,610 |
|
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
| Create/Manage/Maintain Database | Develop computer tools and interfaces to enhance acquisition, standardization and submission of harvest data (sponsor) | The sponsor will work closely with agency partners to assist in development of tools and applications to assist in capture and management of harvest data. | 10/1/2006 | 9/30/2010 | $31,577 |
|
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
| Create/Manage/Maintain Database | Develop computer tools and interfaces to enhance acquisition, standardization and submission of harvest data (contractors) | The agency partners will work to develop tools and applications that assist in acquisition and management of harvest data from within their respective agencies, working collaboratively with the other agencies and PSMFC. | 10/1/2006 | 9/30/2010 | $19,875 |
|
Biological objectives |
Metrics |
||||
Section 8. Budgets
Itemized estimated budget
| Item | Note | FY07 | FY08 | FY09 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personnel | [blank] | $83,336 | $87,503 | $91,978 |
| Fringe Benefits | [blank] | $33,831 | $35,523 | $37,299 |
| Supplies | [blank] | $2,268 | $2,381 | $2,500 |
| Travel | [blank] | $5,413 | $5,684 | $5,968 |
| Overhead | [blank] | $23,996 | $25,196 | $26,456 |
| Totals | $148,844 | $156,287 | $164,201 | |
Total estimated FY 2007-2009 budgets
| Total itemized budget: | $469,332 |
| Total work element budget: | $469,332 |
Cost sharing
| Funding source/org | Item or service provided | FY 07 est value ($) | FY 08 est value ($) | FY 09 est value ($) | Cash or in-kind? | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Totals | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Section 9. Project future
|
FY 2010 estimated budget: $172,411 FY 2011 estimated budget: $172,411 |
Comments: Exact costs uncertain. Workload depends difficultyof obtaining data from the many indpendent and sometimes contradictory sources. Development of automated data capture routines would hopefully help to reduce workload, but we need to learn more first. |
Future O&M costs: Maintainance of the data collected should occur in perpetuity. Because the data will be managed as part of the StreamNet database, future cost to maintain the data specifically collected under this project should be minimal. Costs for annual updates in the future, should they occur, would be less than annual costs given here because data sources would already be known and data capture tools would already exist. Potential measurable costs in the future may result from changes in database structure or standards that would require data conversions, but none are anticipated at this time.
Termination date: none
Comments:
Final deliverables: A final report for this project will be provided. Data sets created under this project will be available from the StreamNet web site at www.streamnet.org.
Section 10. Narrative and other documents
Reviews and recommendations
| FY07 budget | FY08 budget | FY09 budget | Total budget | Type | Category | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPCC FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Oct 23, 2006) [full Council recs] | ||||||
| $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | Expense | Basinwide | Do Not Fund |
| NPCC DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Sep 15, 2006) [full Council recs] | ||||||
| $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | Basinwide | ||
ISRP PRELIMINARY REVIEW (Jun 2, 2006)
Recommendation: Not fundable
NPCC comments: This minimalist proposal does not clearly identify the incremental benefits to fish and wildlife that would derive from the expanded acquisition and display of data. The idea may be good but the proposal is confusing to read and leaves out essential information about the data and its application. The proposal lacks a logical progression in the presentation. This proposal doesn't tell a coherent story. The proposal is too cursory and general to justify the proposed actions. It is not clear that the content of existing databases has been considered. The CWT data system already collects much of these data. What is the relationship of this project to the CWT data system? PSMFC is the home of PACFIN and RACFIN data, but there is not evidence of strong coordination with this proposal. Not enough information is provided to evaluate the adequacy of facilities or to determine if the proportion of personnel time to be devoted to the project is appropriate.
ISRP FINAL REVIEW (Aug 31, 2006)
Recommendation: Not fundable
NPCC comments: This minimalist proposal does not clearly identify the incremental benefits to fish and wildlife that would derive from the expanded acquisition and display of data. The idea may be good but the proposal is confusing to read and leaves out essential information about the data and its application. The proposal lacks a logical progression in the presentation. This proposal doesn't tell a coherent story. The proposal is too cursory and general to justify the proposed actions. It is not clear that the content of existing databases has been considered. The CWT data system already collects much of these data. What is the relationship of this project to the CWT data system? PSMFC is the home of PACFIN and RACFIN data, but there is not evidence of strong coordination with this proposal. Not enough information is provided to evaluate the adequacy of facilities or to determine if the proportion of personnel time to be devoted to the project is appropriate.