FY 2001 Action Plan proposal 23018
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
23018 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Crawford Vegetative Management Road Decommission |
Proposal ID | 23018 |
Organization | USDA Forest Service, Malheur National Forest, Blue Mountain Ranger District (USFS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Dan Hagen, Access And Travel Manager |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 849 John Day, OR 97845 |
Phone / email | 5415753342 / dhagen@fs.fed.us |
Manager authorizing this project | DoMaiolie ug Robin, District Ranger |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Action Plan |
Province / Subbasin | Blue Mountain / Grande Ronde |
Short description | Decommission 45 miles of developed forest roads in the Crawford Vegetation Management Project of the Upper Middle Fork John Day River watershed. These roads are currently hindering spawning, rearing, and/or migration of two federally listed fish species. |
Target species | steelhead, bull trout, chinook, redband |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
44.64 | -118.64 | Upper Middle Fork John Day River |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Main objective is to restore mid-Columbia River summer steelhead and Columbia basin bull trout populations to levels not warranting federal listing. Eliminating risk of culvert plugging and subsequent "blowout". Expectations are one contractor. | a. Removing culverts and recontoring and amouring stream draw bottoms. | 3.25 | $64,000 | Yes |
2. Reduce stream sedimentation by establishing ground cover. Expectations are one contractor. | b. Scarification and grass seeding | 1.0 | $10,000 | Yes |
3. Reduce sediment input from inboard ditches. Seasonally raise riparian water table for slow movement of water to stream. Expectations are one contractor. | c. Construction of water bars | 0.5 | $16,000 | Yes |
4. Monitor results using redd counts and population surveys with Forest Service biologists and Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife personnel. | d. Monitor fish population and activity | 1.0 | $8,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 |
---|---|
$2,500 | $20,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
---|---|---|---|
$13,000 | $13,500 | $6,000 | $6,500 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: Forest Service support personnel | $15,520 |
Supplies | Stakes, flagging, computer time, camera, film, etc. | $3,000 |
Travel | 3,000 miles | $2,550 |
Indirect | $1,000 | |
PIT tags | # of tags: For identified work in above table numbers 1, 2, and 3. | $90,000 |
$112,070 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $112,070 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $112,070 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
Blue Mountain Demonstration Area | 45 miles of road decommissioning and 75 miles of road closures. | $64,000 | cash |
$20,000 | cash | ||
Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife | Personnel for redd counts and population surveys (outyear) | $30,750 | in-kind |
BPA | Supplies, materials, property identified in third line of itemized table above plus remaining non-funded portion of $90,000 - $62,000. | $29,000 | cash |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 2001-7)
ISRP Review (ISRP 2001-7)
Recommendation:
Not fundable under this solicitation
Not fundable under this solicitation
Date:
Jun 21, 2001
Jun 21, 2001
Comment:
Not fundable under this solicitation. The proposal does not meet the Action Plan criteria or scope of activities. The rationale is good, and in general the action is known to be beneficial. However, the claims for potential benefit are not supported in the proposal through references or otherwise. The proposal specifically identifies the roads to be decommissioned. Cost share is good. The M&E effort seems ample, but the plans for it are not well described.