FY 2001 Action Plan proposal 26004

Additional documents

TitleType
26004 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleAhtanum, Toppenish, Simcoe Flow Monitoring and Water Conservation
Proposal ID26004
OrganizationBureau of Indian Affiars (BIA)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameRoger Henderson
Mailing addressBox 220 Wapato, WA
Phone / email5098773155 / rojetj@hotmail.com
Manager authorizing this projectPierce Harrison
Review cycleFY 2001 Action Plan
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau /
Short descriptionInstall flow monitoring equipment on several irrigation ditches in order to manage and limit irrigation delieveries and provide instream flows; line portions of irrigation canal in order to conserve water for instream flows.
Target speciesmid-Columbia steelhead, bull trout
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
46.551 -120.6388 Ahtanum Creek
46.33 -120.77 Toppenish Creek
46.38 -120.77 Simcoe Creek
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Install flow monitoring equipment at the following locations: Ahtanum Creek-WIP Upper Canal, WIP Lower Canal, John Cox Ditch, Ahtanum Irrigation District Main Canal, Ahtanum Creek-2 a. Purchase equipment and prepare site. b. Install flow monitoring equipment. a. 3 months b. 1 month $75,000
2. Install flow monitoring equipment at the following locations: Toppenish Creek-Toppenish Lateral Canal, Toppenish Creek a. Purchase equipment and prepare site. b. Install flow monitoring equipment. a. 3 months b. 1 month $30,000
3. Install flow monitoring equipment at the floowing locations: Simcoe Creek-WIP Simcoe Canal, Hoptowit Ditch, Simcoe Creek-2 a. Purchase equipment and prepare site. b. Install flow monitoring equipment. a. 3 months b. 1 month $50,000
4. Line approximately one mile of Ahtanum Main Canal. a. Site prep and material purchase. b. line canal. a. 1 month b. 2 months $180,000
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005
$60,000$60,000$60,000$60,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Supplies Flow monitoring equpment, 12 each: 170 cubic yards of shotcrete. $184,000
$184,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$184,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$184,000
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
WIP Personnel, site prep, equipment installation, canal lining, construction and ecavation equipment, project supervision. $140,000 in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Do not fund - inadequate proposal
Date:
Jun 21, 2001

Comment:

Not Fundable; inadequate proposal. This brief proposal is to line approximately one mile of the Ahtanum Main Canal saving ~5 cfs of water to be retained in Ahtanum Creek and to install flow monitoring equipment. Adequate justification was not given to demonstrate that gaging would provide direct on-the-ground benefit to fish. In other words, the proposal is not convincing that monitoring of the flow will ensure that the saved water will remain in the stream or that instream flow will otherwise be improved. The canal-lining portion of the proposal seems to satisfy the eligibility criteria for funding under this solicitation. However, virtually no detail is given on the proposed canal lining and the associated water savings. What does 5 cfs mean in relation to total stream flow? Does the 5 cfs estimate account for the portion of the leaked water that goes back to the river through the aquifer? What assurances are there that the water saved will remain instream (downstream appropriators)? The proposal does not describe protection through instream water rights.

The project has good cost share and long term O&M funding from the Wapato Irrigation Project. Resumes were not included.