FY 2001 Action Plan proposal 26008
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 26008 Narrative | Narrative |
| Attached Photo 1 | Narrative Attachment |
| Attached Photo 2 | Narrative Attachment |
| Attached Photo 3 | Narrative Attachment |
| Attached Photo 4 | Narrative Attachment |
| Attached Photo 5 | Narrative Attachment |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Omak Creek Relocation Implementation |
| Proposal ID | 26008 |
| Organization | Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation (CCT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Christopher J. Fisher |
| Mailing address | Omak Community Cener/ P.O. Box 862 Omak, WA 98841 |
| Phone / email | 5094227427 / anadromous@colvilletribes.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | Gerry Marco |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Action Plan |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Cascade / Okanogan |
| Short description | This project is the construction, of 1/2 mile of open channel, that would ensure fish passage, improve bank stability, substantially reduce the amount of sediment delivered to the channel and improve spawning and rearing habitat in Omak Creek. |
| Target species | Summer steelhead |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 48.4009 | -119.508 | T 34N R 26 E Sec 36 |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Objective 1 Ensure fish passage | Task 1a: Represent CCT, coordinate, assist and supervise efforts between subcontractors and CCT | 4.0 | $32,337 | |
| Task 1b: Stabilize stream banks/create floodplain | 0.75 | $200,000 | Yes | |
| Task 1c: Create navigable stream channel | 0.25 | $50,000 | Yes | |
| Objective 2 Improve water quality | Task 2a: Reduce amount of sediment | 0.25 | $40,000 | Yes |
| Task 2b:Reduce water temperature/plant vegetation | 0.50 | $14,385 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
| FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|---|
| $2,500 | $2,500 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|---|
| $1,000 | $1,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 1 biologist, 4 months; 1 technician, 4 months | $19,111 |
| Fringe | 30% of salary | $5,734 |
| Supplies | vegetative material (3,900 plants, 360 rodent protectors) | $9,375 |
| Indirect | 39.2% of salary | $7,492 |
| PIT tags | # of tags: Local construction contractor | $260,000 |
| Subcontractor | Environmental Engineers/construction oversite | $30,000 |
| Subcontractor | Vegetative planting crew (3 crew members, 1 foreman) | $5,010 |
| $336,722 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $336,722 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $336,722 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Resources Conservation Service | cash (cost-share 46% of total project, 50% of construction costs | $290,000 | cash |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 2001-7)
ISRP Review (ISRP 2001-7)
Recommendation:
Not fundable under this solicitation
Not fundable under this solicitation
Date:
Jun 21, 2001
Jun 21, 2001
Comment:
Not fundable under this solicitation. This proposal is more appropriate for the Columbia Cascade Provincial Review where the project can be reviewed in the context of the subbasin. The proposers should strengthen their proposal for that process. The threats addressed by this proposal are not likely immediate and consequently the benefits are not likely immediate. They do not have a concrete plan. This project would relocate Omak Creek through a ½ mile reach of a lumber mill being purchased by the Colville Confederated Tribes to avoid a potential passage problem. The project only marginally satisfies the criteria for funding under this solicitation, because the passage problem does not appear to exist at the present time. However, this is a worthwhile project because of the potential sedimentation problems should the construction not proceed.