FY 2001 Action Plan proposal 26009

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
26009 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Omak Creek spring chinook/summer steelhead acclimation facility
Proposal ID	26009
Organization	Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation (CCT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Chris Fisher
Mailing address	P.O. Box 150 Nespelem, WA 99155
Phone / email	5094227427 / anadromous@colvilletribes.com
Manager authorizing this project	Jerry Marco
Review cycle	FY 2001 Action Plan
Province / Subbasin	Columbia Cascade / Okanogan
Short description	This project is necessary to imprint Carson ancestry spring chinook and ESA listed summer steelhead to Omak Creek, thereby reducing the likelihood of straying.
Target species	Spring chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and summer steelhead (O. mykiss)

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description
48.3595	-119.4372	See photographs in the narrative (part 2)

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor
1. Perform a site survey (topography) of the proposed area			$0	Yes
	a. Site background research, point location.	0.1	$450	Yes
	b. Survey topography of site	0.1	$1,920	Yes
	c. Input and digitally connect points.	0.1	$780	Yes
2. Develop the physical design of the acclimation facility.			$0	Yes
	a. Examine the topography and hydrology.	0.5	$5,800	Yes
	b. Develop final design and specifications of the facility.	1.0	$11,600	Yes
3. Construct the facility			$0	Yes
	a. Mobilize the construction crew and equipment.	0.1	$2,000	Yes
	b. Construct the facility.	1.5	$45,000	Yes
	c. Construction observation	1.5	$3,400	Yes

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 2001 cost
PIT tags	# of tags: Survey/design	$23,950
Subcontractor	Construction/oversight	$47,000
		$70,950

Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 cost	$70,950
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 2001 budget request	$70,950
FY 2001 forecast from 2000	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 2001-7)

Recommendation:
Not fundable under this solicitation

Date:
Jun 21, 2001

Comment:

Not fundable under this solicitation. The threats addressed by this proposal are not immediate and they do not have a concrete plan. This proposal could be better justified and submitted in the Columbia Cascade Provincial Review. Although the benefits are not immediate, this project may help in the long term. This too brief (sketchy) proposal to build an acclimation facility meets one of the criteria for funding under this solicitation: fish stock relocation and out planting. The project may be worthwhile in that it should reduce straying of returning Carson spring chinook into the Methow and Entiat basins that contain the endangered Methow composite stock. The sponsors should, however, explain why they propose to use Carson stock as opposed to upper Columbia River brood stock. Long-term O and M and M and E are required.