FY 2001 Action Plan proposal 26033

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleOkanogan Watershed Land and Water Rights Acquisition
Proposal ID26033
OrganizationConfederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation (CCT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameJerry Marco
Mailing addressP.O. Box 150 Nespelem, WA 99155
Phone / email5096342114 / cctfish@mail.wsu.edu
Manager authorizing this projectJoe Peone
Review cycleFY 2001 Action Plan
Province / SubbasinColumbia Cascade /
Short descriptionProtect and enhance listed and non-listed salmonid habitat in the Okanogan Watershed through the acquistion of land with river frontage and water and/or water rights.
Target speciesESA listed Upper Columbia River Steelhead, summer chinook, sockeye, resident fish
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
48.15 -119.65 General project area is lower 35 miles of Okanogan River.
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Objective 1. Purchase property in Okanogan Subbasin with river frontage or water rights. Task a. Purchase site 1. 3 $1,001,500
Objective 1. Task b. Purchase site 2. 3 $173,500
Objective 1. Task c. Purchase site 3. 3 $221,500
Objective 1. Task d. Purchase site 4. 3 $2,001,500
Objective 1. Task e. Purchase site 5. 3 $39,000
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel FTE: CCT Land Purchase Administrative Costs $3,375
Fringe CCT Land Purchase Administrative Costs $2,250
Indirect CCT Land Purchase Administrative Costs $1,875
Capital Acquisition of all 5 proposed sites $3,429,500
$3,437,000
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$3,437,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$3,437,000
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fundable?
Date:
Jun 21, 2001

Comment:

Fundable? This project meets the solicitation criteria. There are both ESA and non-ESA species, and the proposal would be a one-time action within the year benefiting both flow increase in a tributary and passage improvements (by way of more water), as well as protection of riparian habitats (and opportunities for enhancements). The proposal is for 5 purchases of land (total about 1,141 acres ranging from 20 to 837 acres) and water rights along the lower 22 miles of the Okanogan River, Washington. Some properties have river frontage but no water right; others have no frontage but a water right. The proposal relates the project to the FWP and other local land purchase projects.

The tracts to be purchased are those on the market now rather than the result of study and prioritization, but are all considered valuable for fish and wildlife. Water rights still must be verified and the hydraulic connectivity to surface water determined. The seniority of the water rights was not discussed, nor were assurances given that water rights allocated to stream flow would remain in the river. Who would hold the water rights was not discussed. This lack of prior planning may compromise the assumptions of value and the ability to carry out the purchases in a timely fashion. An increase in minimum Okanogan River minimum flows by 3.1% by the water right acquisitions (from 288 cfs) does not seem like a critical increase in comparison to purchases in other proposals where the acquired water right adds water to de-watered reaches.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Jun 29, 2001

Comment:


Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Jul 12, 2001

Comment:

Defer to Columbia Plateau: the criteria established for this solicitation did not include land acquisitions. Furthermore, these types of global watershed actions would be better defined within the context of their respective subbasins and best prioritized through upcoming subbasin assessments and revised subbasin plans.