FY 2001 Action Plan proposal 26037
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 26037 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | On-Farm Water Conservation opportunities in Oregon, Washington and Idaho |
| Proposal ID | 26037 |
| Organization | IRZ Consulting, LLC (IRZ) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Fred Ziari |
| Mailing address | 505 East Main Hermiston, OR |
| Phone / email | / irz@irz.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | Fred Ziari |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Action Plan |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Umatilla |
| Short description | Conduct on-farm water conservation sevices for farms in Oregon, Washinton and Idaho. We will contact and enlist farms to particiapte in a one year water conservtion measures. Anticipated water savings ranging from 10% to 50% & energy savings 10 to 20%. |
| Target species | ALL |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 45.57 | -118.93 | Farms in Oregon, Washington and Idaho |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conserve Water and have it dedicated for fihsery for 2001 irrigation season | Conduct On-Farm Water Conservation on over 100,000 acres | 6 | $2,500,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Subcontractor | Lump Sum | $2,500,000 |
| $2,500,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $2,500,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $2,500,000 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| Various farms | $200,000 | cash |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Not fundable, inadequate proposal. This proposal is incomplete and does not include the necessary information to meet the solicitation criteria such as description of direct on the ground benefits to species impacted by the power emergency. Specific activities, location of activities, populations to benefit, and methods are not described. There is no basis for judging the potential of the proposal for helping to address problems caused by the emergency action.