FY 2003 Columbia Estuary proposal 30009
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 30009 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Coastal Cutthroat Movements in the Columbia River Estuary |
| Proposal ID | 30009 |
| Organization | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Joseph Zydlewski |
| Mailing address | US Fish and Wildlife Service, CRFPO, 9317 Highway 99, Suite I Vancouver, WA 98665 |
| Phone / email | 3606967605 / joe_zydlewski@fws.gov |
| Manager authorizing this project | Howard Schaller |
| Review cycle | Columbia Estuary |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Estuary / Columbia Estuary |
| Short description | Juvenile and adult cutthroat trout from four Columbia River tributaries will be tagged. Movements will be monitored by aerial surveys (radio tags) or a tethered array (acoustic tags). Data will be analyzed using the CORIE model for physical parameters. |
| Target species | Coastal cutthroat trout, southwest Washington/Columbia River Distinct Population Segment (DPS), currently being considered for listing. |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 46.185 | -123.1575 | Abernathy Creek (mouth) tagging site for juveniles and adults |
| 46.1825 | -123.1725 | Mill Creek (mouth) tagging site for juveniles and adults |
| 46.1833 | -123.1233 | Germany Creek (mouth) tagging site for juveniles and adults |
| 46.3 | -123.97 | Chinook River (mouth) tagging site for juveniles and adults |
| 46.23 | -123.5 | Columbia River Estuary - area for deployment of acoustic array |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
| 197 |
| 161 |
| 159 |
| 9 |
| 193 |
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| New | Not Appicable |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of delayed mortality of juvenile salmonids in the near ocean environment following passage through the Columbia River hydrosystem COE project #BP-00-10 | Collaboration, coordination and cost sharing for aerial surveys, deployment and maintenance of acoustic array |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $0 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Identify mainstem and plume habitat use by juveniles | a. tag juveniles at Abernathy, Germany and Mill Creeks with radio tags | 4 | $67,546 | Yes |
| b. monitor movements using aerial survey | 4 | $35,775 | ||
| c. tag juvenile from Chinook River with acoustic tags | 4 | $16,707 | ||
| d. deploy and maintain acoustic array | 4 | $21,773 | ||
| e. compile and analyze data | $12,443 | |||
| 2. Identify mainstem and plume habitat use by adults | a. capture and tag adults in Abernathy, Mill, Germany Creeks and the Chinook River with acoustic tags | 4 | $57,777 | |
| b. deploy and maintain reduced acoustic array year-round and conduct monthly boat surveys using towed acoustic receiver | 4 | $62,206 | ||
| c. compile and analyze data | 4 | $20,324 | ||
| 3. Identify physical parameters associated with Columbia River estuary cutthroat habitat | a. compile hitorical data from state and federal sources, including WDFW, ODFW, NMFS and USFWS | 4 | $13,352 | |
| b. compile telemetry data from Objectives 1 and 2 | 4 | $13,352 | ||
| c. model trends in estuary and plume physical parameters associated with spatial and temporal trends in presence | 4 | $13,352 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Identify mainstem and plume habitat use by juveniles | 2003 | 2006 | $154,243 |
| 2. Identify mainstem and plume habitat use by adults | 2003 | 2006 | $140,309 |
| 3. Identify physical parameters associated with Columbia River estuary cutthroat habitat | 2003 | 2005 | $40,055 |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
|---|---|---|
| $351,337 | $368,904 | $340,980 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2003 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: GS-11 (1.0),GS-9 (1.0), GS-9(6) (0.05), GS-5 (1.0) | $112,923 |
| Fringe | 35% | $31,049 |
| Supplies | $98,625 | |
| Travel | $3,000 | |
| Indirect | overhead 28.4 % | $74,010 |
| NEPA | Corps of Engineers to provide necessary NEPA documentation for restoration ($109,000) | $0 |
| PIT tags | $0 | |
| Subcontractor | Oregon State University | $15,000 |
| $334,607 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2003 cost | $334,607 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2003 budget request | $334,607 |
| FY 2003 forecast from 2002 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abernathy Fish Technology Center, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Longview, WA | Rearing of cutthroat for tag retention evaluation | $15,000 | in-kind |
| Oregon Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR | Coordination and financial sharing of boats and personnel for the deployment of and maintenance of acoustic array in the Lower Columbia, aerial survey charges, use of mobile telemetry units. | $25,000 | in-kind |
| Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife | Capture of migrating coastal cuttroat trout for tagging in Mill, Germany and Abernathy Creeks | $10,000 | in-kind |
| Sea Resources, Chinook, WA | Capture of migrating coastal cuttroat trout from Chinook River, Coordination with the deployment of acoustic units | $5,000 | in-kind |
| Oregon Health and Science University | Provide modeling experteise, data handling and super computer time for CORIE model evaluations of telemetry data and past catch data | $15,000 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
withdrawnComment:
This project was funded by the USCOE and has therefore been withdrawn from this process.Comment:
Proposal Withdrawn. Funded through a non-BPA source, USACEComment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUWithdrawn - funded by Corps of Engineers
Comments
Already ESA Req?
Biop? No
Comment: