FY 2003 Columbia Estuary proposal 30014

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
30014 Narrative	Narrative
30014 Powerpoint Presentation	Powerpoint Presentation
30014 Powerpoint Presentation Embedded Movie File	Powerpoint Presentation Embedded File
30014 Powerpoint Presentation Embedded Movie File	Powerpoint Presentation Embedded File

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Map Subtidal Large Woody Debris and Other Habitat Features in Relation to Fish Distribution in the Lower Columbia River Estuary
Proposal ID	30014
Organization	Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory (Battelle)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Dana Woodruff
Mailing address	Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory, 1529 West Sequim Bay Rd. Sequim, WA 98382
Phone / email	3606813608 / dana.woodruff@pnl.gov
Manager authorizing this project	Ron Thom, Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory
Review cycle	Columbia Estuary
Province / Subbasin	Columbia Estuary / Columbia Estuary
Short description	Map location and type of large woody debris (LWD) using side scan sonar and quantify conditions where it is most commonly found. Map fish distributions in relation to LWD using underwater video and a DIDSON acoustic camera.
Target species	Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon, Upper Willamette River Chinook Salmon Lower Columbia River Chinook Salmon Columbia River Chum Salmon

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description
46.1832	-123.633	Site 1 South Cathlamet Bay, near Svensen Island
46.2065	-123.6265	Site 2 Cathlamet Bay, near Seal Island
46.2557	-123.5875	Site 3 North Cathlamet Bay, near Elliot Point

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA
RPA 158
RPA 159

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment
	N/A

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2003 cost	Subcontractor
1. Map LWD using side scan sonar	a. Planning, site selection	3	$18,347

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost
1. Map LWD using side scan sonar	2004	2005	$42,990
2. Assess density and distribution of fish	2005	2005	$54,305

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

FY 2004	FY 2005
$42,990	$54,305

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2003 cost
1. Map LWD using side scan sonar	a. Mobilize and test sonar gear	3	$15,155
	b. Collect sonar data at selected sites	3	$33,477
	c. Video drops at high LWD locations	3	$11,503
	d. Analyze sonar and develop LWD polygons	3	$22,755
	e. Assess ands refine sonar and video methods	1	$32,833
2. Assess density and distribution of fish	a. Assess with video	3	$0

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost
1. Map large woody debris using side scan sonar	2004	2004	$87,837
2. Assess density and distributin of fish	2005	2005	$90,486

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

FY 2004	FY 2005
$87,837	$90,486

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2003 cost	Subcontractor
			$0
			$0
			$0
			$0

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost
			$0
			$0
			$0
			$0

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2003 cost	Subcontractor
			$0
			$0
			$0
			$0

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost
			$0
			$0
			$0
			$0

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 2003 cost
Personnel	FTE: 0.51 Man Years	$37,747
Fringe		$9,852
Supplies		$13,771
Travel		$3,606
Indirect	USDOE/DCAA Approved Indirects	$56,906
Capital	NA	$0
NEPA	NA	$0
PIT tags	# of tags: NA	$0
Subcontractor	NA	$0
Other	Fee	$12,188
		$134,070

Total estimated budget

Total FY 2003 cost	$134,070
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 2003 budget request	$134,070
FY 2003 forecast from 2002	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
ISRP Preliminary Review (ISRP 2002-2)

Recommendation:
Do not fund - no response required

Date:
Mar 1, 2002

Comment:

Not fundable. Much of this proposal is concerned with testing techniques. There is no assurance that the side scan sonar techniques will work in shallow water habitats. Nor is there any assurance that the DIDSON device will allow identification of fishes to species or separate salmonids from other fish taxa. To understand the importance of large wood as salmonid habitat, the work should be done in the context of an overall habitat assessment. The need and benefits to fish are not well justified.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
withdrawn

Date:
May 17, 2002

Comment:

withdrawn

REVIEW:
ISRP Final Review (ISRP 2002-11)

Recommendation:
Withdrawn

Date:
Jun 7, 2002

Comment:

Proposal Withdrawn

REVIEW:
NMFS Review

Recommendation:

Date:
Jul 19, 2002

Comment:

Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESU
Project withdrawn

Comments

Already ESA Req?

Biop?

REVIEW:
NWPPC Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Do Not Fund

Date:
Oct 30, 2002

Comment: