FY 2003 Lower Columbia proposal 31010
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
31010 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Re-open Off-channel Habitat for Lower Columbia ESU |
Proposal ID | 31010 |
Organization | City of Portland, Endangered Species Act Program (Portland, OR) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Jim Middaugh |
Mailing address | Bureau of Planning, Suite 4100 1900 SW Fourth Ave. Portland, Oregon 97201 - 5350 |
Phone / email | 5038237032 / jmiddaugh@ci.portland.or.us |
Manager authorizing this project | Jim Middaugh, Manager ESA Program |
Review cycle | Lower Columbia |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Willamette |
Short description | Eliminate velocity barriers to off-channel habitat, facilitate passive restoration for listed species within the Lower Columbia ESU |
Target species | Steelhead, chinook salmon, cutthroat trout |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
Crystal Springs, Portland, OR | ||
45.478 | -122.6317 | Crystal Springs Lake |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Action 149 |
Action 160 |
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
No prior project support |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Customize pre-designed open-bottom culverts, built to specifications | a. generate custom designs | 1 | $12,000 | Yes |
b. demonstrate feasibility of design | 1 | $6,000 | ||
c. agency coordination | 1 | $4,000 | ||
d. project management | 3 | $12,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replace existing culverts | a. | 2003 | $380,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mantain Culverts | $10,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2007 | $40,000 |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
---|---|---|---|
$10,000 | $10,000 | $10,000 | $10,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
Monitor water quality, habitat, and fish presence | 2003 - 2007 | $25,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
Monitor water quality, habitat, and fish presence | 2004 | 2007 | $100,000 |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
---|---|---|---|
$25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2003 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $60,000 | |
Supplies | $200,000 | |
Capital | $100,000 | |
Subcontractor | $89,000 | |
$449,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2003 cost | $449,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2003 budget request | $449,000 |
FY 2003 forecast from 2002 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
Army Corps of Engineers | Design and Analytical support, matching project funding | $600,000 | cash |
City of Portland | Habitat restoration at Westmoreland Park | $500,000 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Do not fund - no response required
Mar 1, 2002
Comment:
Not fundable. The proposal does not provide details on objectives, tasks and methods. The presentation provided some information on monitoring but the monitoring tasks should have been described in the proposal. The benefits to fish and wildlife appear marginal and are not justified in the proposal. The baseline conditions are not established. The impacts on existing species are not adequately described.Comment:
CBFWA supports this project for it's benefits to fish; however, CBFWA does not support Bonneville funding for this action. Although Bonneville has funded culvert replacement within the basin, this project is completely within the management jurisdictionComment:
Not fundable. The proposal does not provide details on objectives, tasks and methods. The presentation provided some information on monitoring but the monitoring tasks should have been described in the proposal. The benefits to fish and wildlife appear marginal and are not justified in the proposal. The baseline conditions are not established. The impacts on existing species are not adequately described.Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUEliminate velocity barriers to off-channel habitat within the Lower Columbia ESU and potentially increase habitat access and salmon survival
Comments
This is a culvert design and replacement project.
Already ESA Req? No
Biop? No
Comment:
Project may be more appropriately addressed by ODFW and the City of Portland under section 4D of the ESA and to address urban planning issues raised in the proposal. We also note that these stocks are not directly affected by FCRPS actions.Comment: