FY 1999 proposal 9032

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
9032 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Teach Adults to Become Holistic Master Watershed Stewards
Proposal ID	9032
Organization	Washington Governor's Council on Environmental Education (GCEE)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Beverly Isenson, Special Assistant, GCEE
Mailing address	P.O. Box 40900 Olympia, WA 98504-0900
Phone / email	3604077317 / BeverlyI@Parks.wa.gov
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 1999
Province / Subbasin	Lower Mid-Columbia / Yakima
Short description	Teach/train adults to work as Master Watershed Stewards in their watersheds, focus on science, community organization, leadership skills to increase community capacity to address fish/wildlife/water issues. Students provide at least 50 hrs community srvc.
Target species

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 1999 cost
Personnel		$37,080
Fringe		$12,257
Supplies		$9,270
Travel		$2,060
Indirect		$21,124
Subcontractor		$0
		$81,791

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 cost	$81,791
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 1999 budget request	$81,791
FY 1999 forecast from 1998	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Identify any constraints that may cause schedule changes. Describe major milestones if necessary. Milestones: Course completed, stewards perform community service.

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Watershed Technical Group Comments

Recommendation:
Pass (Fundable)

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Management Issue: Still appears that there is some room to improve coordination with the watershed groups and the other education project (9405900).

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Not urgent. Proposed activities would not produce significant near-term survival improvement nor risk a lost opportunity within the next 1-3 years.

Questionable management value. Proposal was either incomplete but did not provide adequate information to determine whether management criteria were met or complete but did not meet critical management criteria.

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)

Recommendation:
Adequate

Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

This proposal should receive additional review by educational specialists. The proposal is innovative and involves significant coordination and collaboration among many key land use and resource managers. The goals are worthwhile. The proposal has a scientific focus but does not reference scientific papers and does not adequately detail the curriculum. It should include monitoring to determine how well the individuals are being educated and what they are doing with this knowledge.