FY 1999 proposal 9036

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
9036 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	McKenzie Watershed Habitat Assessment and Project Prioritization
Proposal ID	9036
Organization	McKenzie River Focus Watershed Council
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	John Runyon, Coordinator
Mailing address	P.O. Box 1025 Corvallis, OR 97330
Phone / email	5417580947 / runyon@proaxis.com
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 1999
Province / Subbasin	Lower Columbia / Willamette
Short description	Complete assessment of McKenzie Watershed by synthesizing recent assessments/studies & gathering new information where necessary; will provide basin-wide context for establishing fish/wildlife habitat protection, restoration, monitoring strategies & proje
Target species

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 1999 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 1999 cost
Operating		$10,000
Indirect		$7,000
Subcontractor		$130,000
		$147,000

Total estimated budget

Total FY 1999 cost	$147,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 1999 budget request	$147,000
FY 1999 forecast from 1998	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Watershed Technical Group Comments

Recommendation:
Pass (Fundable)

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Good proposal.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund (low priority)

Date:
May 13, 1998

Comment:

Pending

REVIEW:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)

Recommendation:
Adequate

Date:
Jun 18, 1998

Comment:

While objectives are specific, the ISRP review team comments that methods are too vague (e.g., identify, work with, etc.) and overall, the proposal offers inadequate detail. The sponsors are commended for their intent to conduct a watershed assessment before actual work performance.