FY 1999 proposal 9139
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
9139 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Acquisition of Pine Creek Ranch |
Proposal ID | 9139 |
Organization | Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon (CTWSRO) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Terry Luther |
Mailing address | P.O. Box C Warm Springs, OR 97761 |
Phone / email | 5415533233 / potoole@warmsprings.com |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / John Day |
Short description | Protect and enhance the Pine Creek watershed and it’s fish, wildlife, water, archeological, geological, and educational resources through acquistion and management of the 24,000 acre Pine Creek Ranch. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
Pine Creek Ranch Acquisition | This project is co-funded through the BPA watershed project of the same title |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Capital | $1,200,000 | |
Subcontractor | $0 | |
$1,200,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $1,200,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $1,200,000 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Comment:
Comment:
The purpose is not to purchase the land but to restore ecosystem health. Use of passive restoration is positive. Monitoring design is not described. What are the specific benefits for fish and wildlife? [Projects 9139 and 9140]