FY 1999 proposal 198906200
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Prepare Draft Annual Implementation Work Plan |
Proposal ID | 198906200 |
Organization | Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority (CBFWA) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Brian J. Allee, Ph.D. |
Mailing address | 2501 SW First Ave., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97201 |
Phone / email | 5033267031 / brian@cbfwf.org |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
Short description | Coordinate and promote comprehensive and effective planning and implementation of fish and wildlife programs in the Columbia River Basin, improve the quality of fish and wildlife decision-making and to influence other regional decision-makers. |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
Personnel |
|
$419,466 |
Fringe |
|
$163,592 |
Supplies |
|
$30,403 |
Operating |
|
$5,783 |
Travel |
|
$272,207 |
Indirect |
|
$286,871 |
Subcontractor |
|
$91,135 |
| $1,269,457 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $1,269,457 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $1,269,457 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: N/A
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete: Form incomplete, need minor corrections/addition. On page 9, paragraph 4, the past history cost spreadsheet is missing. On page 7, objectives appear to be mixed up.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
$500K increase from Reserve for Member participation in regional coordination (Volume I, Section IV).
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This is a necessary project that should be supported (ranked in the upper midrange of the set), but the proposal has problems. The objectives include more than the title suggests and seem to describe all the objectives of CBFWA. Past costs are not included. The section on project history is not responsive to the BPA instructions. Information that would have been useful if the proposal is for all of CBFWA funding would include how/when was CBFWA formed, when did the AIWPs start, when was the first Multiyear Work Plan, and what are the relationships to the Foundation. OR, if the proposal is limited to the title, then we need more specific history of the AIWP. The proposal should better describe methods, infrastructure, and specialist groups.