FY 1999 proposal 199004400
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199004400 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Implement Fisheries Enhancement Opportunities :Coeur d’Alene Reservation |
| Proposal ID | 199004400 |
| Organization | Coeur d’Alene Tribe (CDA Tribe) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Kelly Lillengreen |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 408 Plummer, ID 83851 |
| Phone / email | 2086866803 / kellylil@iea.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Upper Columbia / Coeur d'Alene |
| Short description | Habitat restoration, purchase critical watershed areas to protect quality habitat, develop an educational outreach program, develop interim tribal harvest opportunities, construct and operate a hatchery, and 5 year monitoring and evaluation program. |
| Target species | bull trout (proposed ESA listing) westslope cutthroat trout rainbow trout |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 4401 | Lake Creek Land Acquisition | Purchases critical watershed areas in the Lake Creek Drainage for protection of upland and riparian areas deemed critical for restoration of fish and wildlife habitat in the Lake Creek Drainage. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $274,100 | |
| Fringe | $95,935 | |
| Supplies | $60,775 | |
| Capital | hatchery slted for this year/scheduling constraints may limit the need for this amount. | $1,200,000 |
| Travel | $25,000 | |
| Indirect | currently calculated at 31.6% of budget minus capitat and subcontracts | $154,248 |
| Subcontractor | Not determined at this time | $16,500 |
| Other | $32,316 | |
| $1,858,874 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $1,858,874 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $1,858,874 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: 1)Adequate landowner participation 2.) Supplementation feasibility study completed on time 3.) Hatchery NEPA requirements completed on time 4.) Adequate budget to implement interrelated objectives/tasks.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Presentation: This project began in 1992 with a baseline study. In 1995 the Council approved the recommendations from the baseline study and in 1996 implementation got underway. The project has 5 parts: 1) restoration in 4 watersheds; 2) education and outreach; 3) monitoring and evaluation; 4) supplementation; and 5) interim harvest opportunities. Funds for construction of the hatchery are included in the 99 budget so that the tribe won't have to come back for more money when the NEPA/Master Plan/ 3-Step processes are complete. BPA may have to go to Congress to get approval. The Tribe is also doing work on Benewah, Alder and Evans creeks.Questions/Answers:
Concern: The capital expenditure for the hatchery should come out of the capital budget.
What percent is the hatchery cost versus the trout pond construction? Answer: It will take $50,000 - $100,000 to build and maintain each pond. The trout for the ponds have been donated by another hatchery.
How much supplementation is needed? Answer: That will be covered in the master plan.
What does the personnel budget cover? Answer: The $274,000 covers project supervisors, technicians and biologists.
Is there money in this proposal for the Lake Creek Project. Answer: No. Lake Creek is a priority watershed and the purchase will be completed by the end of this year.
Screening Criteria: Yes
Technical Criteria: Yes
Programmatic Criteria: Yes
Comment:
$1,000,000 for hatchery deferred to 2000ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)
Inadequate as a whole, but some portions are adequate
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
Although the ISRP recommends combining integrated projects in one proposal, this proposal is too diffuse and divergent and lacks focus. The habitat study and restoration aspects of the project appear beneficial, but these activities appear to be limited to provision of production and harvest opportunities. The proposal does not make clear the scientific need for or likely efficacy of the hatchery, as described. If the habitat work is done properly, stocking may not be necessary. However, the habitat manipulation techniques described in the proposal appear misguided. The proposal discusses evaluation of the need for supplementation, but it appears the proposers intend to implement hatchery production before completing their background study or watershed analysis. The budget does not appear to be consistent with the objectives. The ISRP does not support this proposal.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $1,197,873 | $1,197,873 | $1,197,873 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website