FY 1999 proposal 199200900
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
199200900 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Yakima Screens - Phase II - O & M |
Proposal ID | 199200900 |
Organization | Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Yakima Screen Shop (WDFW, YSS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | John A. Easterbrooks |
Mailing address | 3705 W. Washington Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 |
Phone / email | 5095752734 / eastejae@dfw.wa.gov |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Yakima |
Short description | YSS performs preventative maintenance and operational adjustments on completed Yakima Phase 2 fish screen facilities to assure optimal fish protection and to extend facility life, thereby protecting BPA's capital investment. |
Target species | Yakima Spring Chinook, Fall Chinook, Steelhead, and Coho |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $54,400 | |
Fringe | $16,900 | |
Supplies | $8,100 | |
Capital | $34,000 | |
Travel | $7,200 | |
Indirect | $25,500 | |
Subcontractor | $0 | |
Other | $10,000 | |
$156,100 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $156,100 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $156,100 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Delays in screen civil works construction caused by diversion water rights uncertainty (state court adjudication), engineering design bottlenecks, property acquisition delays or funding constraints affects the total number of new projects completed each year, and thus the total number of all operational Phase 2 projects that require O&M services in a budget cycle.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Technical Issue: Combine with 8506200, 9105700, and 9107500.Comment:
Comment:
The proposal is basically well done. It is succinct and thorough and demonstrates the need. The results of previous monitoring should be described.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$139,590 | $139,590 | $139,590 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website