FY 1999 proposal 199206800
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Implementation of Willamette Basin Mitigation Program--Wildlife |
| Proposal ID | 199206800 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Gregory B. Sieglitz |
| Mailing address | 7118 NE Vandenberg Ave. Corvallis, OR 97330 |
| Phone / email | 5417574186 / greg.b.sieglitz@state.or.us |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Willamette |
| Short description | Mitigate for hydro-electric facilities through enhancement, easement development, acquisition, restoration, and management of wetlands and other target habitat types and their respective species in the Willamette basin in Oregon. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$100,000 |
| Fringe |
|
$38,000 |
| Supplies |
|
$60,000 |
| Operating |
|
$2,000 |
| Capital |
|
$170,000 |
| Travel |
|
$10,000 |
| Indirect |
|
$20,000 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$100,000 |
| $500,000 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $500,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $500,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Delayed and inadequate funding to implement projects within the scheduled time periods Severe weather conditions which could delay field activities
Unexpected difficulties with the negotiation efforts with landowners
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Need more detail on the existing resource condition and critical limiting factors, measurable objectives, and strategic actions and expected results for achieving those objectives, and the methods for monitoring to determine if expected results are being achieved and how the project will be adaptively managed based on the monitoring.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
20% reduction in all tasks
Recommendation:
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The proposal is weak on objectives, methods, and explanation of the project’s history. They do not detail the methods to achieve mitigation. The proposal is very vague.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
capital
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $350,000 |
$0 |
$0 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website