FY 1999 proposal 199506001
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
199506001 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Enhance Squaw Creek Watershed for Anadromous Fish & Wildlife Habitat |
Proposal ID | 199506001 |
Organization | Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Carl Scheeler |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 638 Pendleton, OR 97801 |
Phone / email | 5412765268 / wildlife@ucinet.com |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Umatilla |
Short description | Protect, enhance watershed resources for wildlife HEP target species for John Day & McNary pools; increase natural production potential of existing summer steelhead, reintroduce chinook and coho salmon in Umatilla River Basin. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $44,091 | |
Fringe | $12,345 | |
Supplies | $17,800 | |
Capital | $12,000 | |
Travel | $4,500 | |
Indirect | $26,770 | |
Subcontractor | $92,494 | |
$209,999 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $209,999 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $210,000 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Possible constraints might include delays due response times from regulatory agencies regarding issuance of permits for proposed in-stream maintenance work.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Technical Issue: Need to provide more detail on the land acquisition (concern that the budget is excessive for the total acreage).Comment:
Fence construction reduced by $10,000Comment:
Objectives were well described, especially the narrative section. The ISRP liked the idea of putting debris on the flood plain rather than directly in the river. Insufficient details were given on monitoring.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$150,000 | $175,000 | $175,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website