FY 1999 proposal 199506300
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
199506300 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Yakima/Klickitat Monitoring and Evaluation Program |
Proposal ID | 199506300 |
Organization | Yakama Indian Nation Fisheries Program (YIN) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Melvin Sampson |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 151, Fort Road Toppenish, WA 98948 |
Phone / email | 5098656262 / yinfish@yakama.com |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Yakima |
Short description | Monitors performance of YKFP in terms of natural production and harvest increases, and ecological and genetic impacts, to guide adaptive management within the project and to provide valuable information on supplementation for the region. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
8812001 | Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Management | Core Management/Admin. support for all YIN's YKFP Tasks. |
8811500 | Yakima Hatchery Construction | Final design/construction of needed acclimation facilities/wells for YFP. |
9701300 | Yakima Cle Elum Hatchery O&M | O&M costs for Cle Elum Suppl. and Research Facilities. Core facility |
8811500 | Fisheries Technician Field Activities | Provides essential technical support to fulfill diverse needs of the YKFP (e.g., M&E support, spawner surveys, juvenile facility operations, marking, etc.) |
8812005 | Fish Passage Video Monitoring | Monitors, at Prosser and Roza Dams, the number of adult salmonids returning to the Yakima Subbasin. A key element of YFP M&E. |
9506404 | Policy/Technical Involvement/Planning -- YKFP | Supports the required co-manager process for the YKFP. |
9506406 | Monitoring of Supplementation Response Variables for the YKFP | Essential for adequate M&E planning and technical participation as co-manager of the YKFP. |
9506402 | Upper Yakima Species Interaction Studies | Vital M&E function relative to impacts of YKFP on existing fish community in Yakima Subbasin, and relative to impacts of existing fish community on YKFP. |
9503300 | O&M of Yakima Fish Protection, Mitigation and Enhancement Facilities | Essential for maintaining effectiveness of Yakima Subbasin fish protection structures. |
9704900 | Teanaway Instream Flow Restoration | Tributary enhancement critical to success of YKFP. |
0 | Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project (YRBWEP): Congressional Act. | Irrigation water conserved by YRBWEP may be allocated in part to benefit fish stocks analyzed by this planning/modeling project. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $467,336 | |
Fringe | $67,628 | |
Supplies | $140,127 | |
Operating | $3,526 | |
Capital | $221,100 | |
Tag | 37,092 | $107,566 |
Travel | $7,828 | |
Indirect | $248,547 | |
Subcontractor | Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; IntStats, Inc.; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of Washington; Central Washington University; National Marine Fisheries Service; Alden Labs, Inc. | $112,479 |
Other | $27,765 | |
Other | $27,765 | |
Other | $27,765 | |
Other | $27,765 | |
Other | $27,765 | |
Other | $27,765 | |
Other | $27,765 | |
$1,570,492 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $1,570,492 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $1,570,492 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Many 1999 studies are contingent primarily on successful completion of preparatory facility work in 1998.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Comment:
ISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)
YKFP Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose as a set
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This proposal is excellent and generally complete. It does a good job of laying out the whole YKFP. However, it does not clearly describe monitoring and evaluation of survival from smolt to adult (SAR). The proposal mentions the video monitoring proposal with respect to SARs but those monitoring activities do not appear to be focused on PIT tags and, thus, are not sufficient to estimate SARs.