FY 1999 proposal 199606700
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Manchester Spring Chinook Broodstock Project |
Proposal ID | 199606700 |
Organization | National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Tom Flagg |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 130 Manchester, WA 98353 |
Phone / email | 2069427181 / Tom.Flagg@NOAA.Gov |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 1999 |
Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Salmon |
Short description | Rear Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon captive broodstocks from Idaho’s Salmon River sub-basin and Oregon’s Grande Ronde River sub-basin. Provide pre-spawning adults, eyed eggs, and juveniles to aid recovery of these ESA-listed stocks. |
Target species | ESA-listed Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
9700100 |
Captive Rearing Initiative for Salmon River Chinook Salmon |
Idaho Department of Fish and Game is also maintaining captive broodstocks for Salmon River sub-basin populations of Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon to avoid catastrophic loss of the gene pool and for rebuilding efforts |
9604400 |
Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Broodstock Program |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife is also maintaining captive broodstocks for Grande Ronde River sub-basin populations of Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon to avoid catastrophic loss of the gene pool and for rebuilding efforts |
9305600 |
Assessment of captive broodstock technology |
Refinement of captive broodstock technology is necessary to maximize potential of captive broodstock recovery programs for ESA-listed stocks of Pacific salmon in the Columbia River Basin |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
Personnel |
|
$78,200 |
Fringe |
|
$13,500 |
Supplies |
|
$161,100 |
Travel |
|
$15,200 |
Indirect |
|
$39,500 |
Subcontractor |
N/A |
$142,500 |
| $450,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 1999 cost | $450,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 1999 budget request | $450,000 |
FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Schedule may be constrained by population viability of ESA-listed stocks in this recovery program. If population numbers are still low by the year 2001, then captive broodstocks may have to be continued to protect the gene pools.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes:
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This proposal is for work to provide an insurance program for stock in critical condition in the wild. This proposal describes the benefits and the risks of their planned activities. The Manchester facility provides salt water rearing that has proved beneficial. Personnel appear to be highly technically competent. The effectiveness of broodstock supplementation needs to be carefully analyzed.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$792,000 |
$767,200 |
$767,200 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website