FY 2000 proposal 20524
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Multi-Year Walla Walla Anadromous Fish Plan |
| Proposal ID | 20524 |
| Organization | Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority (CBFWA) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Tom Giese |
| Mailing address | 2501 SW First Ave., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97201 |
| Phone / email | 5032290191 / tom@cbfwf.org |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2000 |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Walla Walla |
| Short description | |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 9604600 |
Habitat coordination, planning and improvements. |
|
| 20524 |
Multi-Year Plan Walla Walla Anadromous Fish Plan |
|
| 9606400 |
Habitat coordination, planning and improvements. |
|
| 9601200 |
Adult Fish Passage Improvement - WW River |
|
| 9604601 |
Habitat enhancement, watershed coordination, habitat improvements. |
|
| 9010 |
Habitat enhancement, watershed coordination, habitat improvements. |
|
| 9601100 |
Juvenile Fish Passage Improvement - WW River |
|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$0 |
| Fringe |
|
$0 |
| Supplies |
|
$0 |
| $0 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2000 cost | $0 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2000 budget request | $0 |
| FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
NA - Umbrella Proposal
Date:
Jun 15, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
NA - Umbrella Proposal
Comments:
It seems premature to fund any projects for multiple years until their need and effectiveness have been documented through an umbrella project that evaluates them in a larger context such as a subbasin plan. It would be helpful to have BPA fund 6 or 8 regional evaluators who oversee and report on results of subbasin activities. These individuals should be well trained in science and independent from the entities funded by BPA. Perhaps they could be viewed as extensions of the ISRP. Questions to be addressed would be to what extent is the collection of subbasin activities benefiting fish and wildlife? Is there fiscal accountability? Are the most cost-effective alternatives being implemented? Have limiting factors been identified and addressed? Prior to full implementation of the Walla Walla Anadromous Fish Plan the underlying limiting factors that have been identified, i.e. water quality and quantity, should be dealt with.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Technical Criteria 1: Met? NA - Programmatic Criteria 2: Met? NA - Inadequate and is too general to fill the need for planning and integration.
Milestone Criteria 3: Met? NA -
Resource Criteria 4: Met? NA -