FY 2000 proposal 20535
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 20535 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Multi-Year Salmon Anadromous Fish Plan |
| Proposal ID | 20535 |
| Organization | Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority (CBFWA) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Tom Giese |
| Mailing address | 2501 SW First Ave., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97201 |
| Phone / email | 5032290191 / tom@cbfwf.org |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2000 |
| Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / Salmon |
| Short description | |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 9107100 | Determine sockeye carrying capacity for nursery lakes in Salmon basin. | |
| 9703800 | Preserve chinook gametes by cryo-preservation. | |
| 9703000 | Compare adult chinook returns via passive underwater video. | |
| 8909800 | Evaluate usefulness of supplementation as recovery/restoration method. | |
| 8909801 | Evaluate usefulness of supplementation as recovery/restoration method. | |
| 8909802 | Evaluate usefulness of supplementation as recovery/restoration method. | |
| 8909803 | Evaluate usefulness of supplementation as recovery/restoration method. | |
| 9005500 | Evaluate usefulness of supplementation as recovery/restoration method. | |
| 9204000 | Captive rearing to aid in recovery of Stanley Basin sockeye. | |
| 9064 | Describe factors influencing distribution/persistence of wild chinook | |
| 9107200 | Captive rearing to aid in recovery of Stanley Basin sockeye. | |
| 9405000 | Habitat enhancement/restoration at multiple sites, conduct O&M and M&E | |
| 9801002 | Captive rearing monitoring. | |
| 9107300 | Continue monitoring natural production in Salmon & Clearwater subbasins. | |
| 20535 | MYP Salmon Anadromous Fish Plan | |
| 9401500 | Construction/maintenance of screens, pumps, fish ladders, surveys. | |
| 9606700 | Implement side stream incubation and captive broodstock rearing. | |
| 9009 | Restore healthy riparian corridor along 12 mi. of Salmon River. | |
| 9202603 | Support Idaho Model Watershed administration and coordination. | |
| 9401700 | Implement habitat restoration in Lemhi, Pahsimeroi, East Fork drainages. | |
| 9202408 | Implement tribal law enforcement activities to protect fishery. | |
| 9600700 | Eliminate 3 diversions and install pump on Salmon River. | |
| 9306200 | Habitat enhancement to increase flow, reduce barriers, restore riparian veg | |
| 9401700 | Habitat enhancement to increase flow, reduce barriers, restore riparian veg | |
| 9604300 | Increase survival of weak summer chinook stocks on Johnson Creek. | |
| 9705700 | Implement side stream incubation and captive broodstock rearing. | |
| 9700100 | Implement side stream incubation and captive broodstock rearing. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $0 | |
| Fringe | $0 | |
| Supplies | $0 | |
| $0 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2000 cost | $0 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2000 budget request | $0 |
| FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Recommendation: NA - Umbrella ProposalComments: Five ostensibly "outcome-based" objectives are listed that the co-managers have adopted to address the problems identified in the proposal. The fifth of these is: "supplement where needed with genetically-appropriate salmon and steelhead in the subbasin using stock specific escapement criteria capable of maintaining stock productivity, survival and genetic diversity." This objective is in fact not outcome-based, but rather states foremost the expected performance of an activity (supplementation). The emphasis appears to be on keeping technical programs going rather than on achieving results. The underlying outcome-based objective, if a valid one exists (it may be hinted at in the last part of the quoted sentence), should be made clear in a re-casting of this fifth item.
Comment:
Comment:
Criteria all: Met? N/A -