FY 2000 proposal 198910800

Additional documents

TitleType
198910800 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleMonitor and Evaluate Modeling Support
Proposal ID198910800
OrganizationUniversity of Washington (UW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameJames J. Anderson
Mailing address1325 - 4th Ave., Suite 1820 Seattle, WA 98101
Phone / email2065434772 / jim@fish.washington.edu
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 2000
Province / SubbasinMainstem/Systemwide / Systemwide
Short descriptionTest hypotheses underlying key salmon recovery management decisions, develop decisions analysis to evaluate alternative management strategies, and assist in designing research monitoring and adaptive management experiments.
Target speciesChinook and steelhead
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1995 The Mainstem passage and Adult Harvest models, CRiSP.1 and CRiSP.2 were completed and calibrated.
Theory and calibration manuals were prepared. Participated in in-season database development. Began analyzing the impact of ocean conditions on smolt survival.
1996 Revised and recalibrated CRiSP.1 and CRiSP.2. Successfully ported CRiSP.2 from Unix platform to Windows 95, making it more accessible to the public.
Revised manuals for both models. Expanded our in-season database that gave regional fisheries community real-time access to river and fish passage conditions through the World Wide Web.
Provided real-time projections of fish passage for various stocks at sites in the Snake and Columbia Rivers. Published daily predictions on the World Wide Web. Continued the impact of ocean analysis.
1997 Improved DART web database. Completed manual update for CRiSP.2 through the on-line help. Released CRiSP.2 NT/Windows 95 and an alpha version of CRiSP.1 for NT/Windows 95.
Continued a combined effort between CRiSP and RealTime (developed under Dr. John Skalski) to provide real-time projections of fish passage for various stocks.
Implemented gas predictions for in-season management of the impacts of the hydrosystem on gas levels in the river on our web site.
1998 Developed CRiSP1.6 to include gas mortality algorithm. Updated the survival calibration tool for the new version (1.6).
Updated in-season and post-season analyses.
Maintained and monitored Columbia Basin Research (CBR) web pages and answered requested information from the public as they are received.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
9601700 Provide Technical Support in PATH - BioAnalysts Inc. (Giorgi) CRiSP model output utilized by these groups in their analyses.
9600600 PATH Facilitation, Technical Assistance & Peer Review CRiSP model output utilized by these groups in their analyses.
9600800 PATH-Participation by State & Tribal Agencies CRiSP model output utilized by these groups in their analyses.
9800100 Analytical Support-PATH and ESA Biological Assessments - Hinrichsen CRiSP model output utilized by these groups in their analyses.
9303701 Technical Assistance with Life Cycle Modeling - Paulsen Environmental CRiSP model output utilized by these groups in their analyses.
9007800 Evaluate Predator Control and Provide Technical Support for PATH Provides input for model development.
9601900 Second Tier data base for ecosystem focus Data from this source are used for model calibration.
9700200 UW PATH support Our specific tasks involve mainstem passage issues, effects of the ocean and estuary on survival, and harvest issues.
8910700 Statistical Support for Salmonid Studies Information from this project is used to calibrate and validate the CRiSP models.
9105100 Monitoring & Evaluation Statistical Report (Dr. Skalski) Cooperate with this group to produce CRiSP/Real-time outputs.
20537 Bonneville Power Administration Non-Discretionary Projects
8910800 Monitor and Evaluate Modeling Support

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2000 cost
Personnel Direct Salary $209,305
Fringe Standard UW benefit rates $47,130
Supplies $10,486
Operating $18,874
Capital Office Lease & minor equip. upgrade $25,751
Travel $3,900
Indirect 26% of Modified Total Direct Costs $79,221
Other Tuition fees $1,633
Subcontractor Lang, Railsback & Associates $15,000
$411,300
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost$411,300
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2000 budget request$411,300
FY 2000 forecast from 1999$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Uncertainties of schedules from coordinated groups may cause schedule changes.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Jun 15, 1999

Comment:

Recommendation: Do not fund. PATH, in its present form, with its present mission, should be phased out. A simpler process could be created to meet the continuing need for evaluation of the limited data now available to address management questions relative to the hydro biological opinion. A more ambitious and comprehensive scientific consensus process should be developed, somewhat along the lines of PATH, to address data collection design issues for the basin, to identify data needs that are critical to the actual management questions, and to ensure that data needs are met, to the extent practical, as quickly as possible, in a coordinated and efficient manner.

Comments: The past programmatic need for this work was clearly stated. The continuing need is not clear. The model is not validated. This is a key issue if the differences between the competing models are still unresolved.


Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:


Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

BPA Non-Discretionary. Services listed are not used by the managers, in general. Should include such services as a part of other projects. Should be linked to a PATH umbrella. Appears to duplicate work proposed in another proposal by J. Anderson. Fails to inform critical management decisions.
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

Technical Criteria 1: Met? Yes -

Programmatic Criteria 2: Met? Inc - No regional application

Milestone Criteria 3: Met? Yes -

Resource Criteria 4: Met? No - Too much money!


Recommendation:
Money placed in BPA Tech Support Project Placeholder
Date:
Mar 1, 2000

Comment:

[Decision made in 12-7-99 Council Meeting]; Funding subject to independent review: BPA non-discretionary (Technical Support Project Placeholder)