FY 2000 proposal 199106000
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
199106000 Narrative | Narrative |
199106000 Sponsor Response to the ISRP | Response |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Pend Oreille Wetlands Wildlife Mitigation Project - Kalispel |
Proposal ID | 199106000 |
Organization | Kalispel Tribe of Indians (KNRD) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Ray D. Entz |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 39 Usk, WA 99180 |
Phone / email | 5094451147 / rentz@knrd.org |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 2000 |
Province / Subbasin | Inter-Mountain / Pend Oreille |
Short description | Protect, restore, enhance and maintain important wetland/riparian wildlife habitat along the Pend Oreille River as partial mitigation for the construction and operation impacts associated with Albeni Falls Dam consistent with regional planning documents. |
Target species | Bald Eagle (breeding and wintering), Black-capped Chickadee, Canada Goose, Mallard, Muskrat, Yellow Warbler, and White-tailed deer |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1992 | Land acquisition of 436 acre parcel for baseline protection of 371 HU's |
1993 | Began management efforts on the project |
1994 | Completed bio-engineered shoreline stabilization projects on highly eroded banks |
1995 | Completed implementation of three wetland control structures for increased wetland quantity, quality, and diversity |
1996 | Completed the construction of two nesting islands for waterfowl |
1997 | Land acquisition of additional 164 acre adjjacent parcel for baseline protection of 246 HU's |
1997 | Five-year HEP update on original purchase showing an increase of 182 HU's through management activities |
1998 | Completed 25 acres of riparian cottonwood reforestation on the main acquisition site |
1998 | Completed 30 acres of hardwood stand improvement on the main acquisition site |
1998 | Completed the draft management plan for the additional parcel |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
9206100 | Albeni Falls Wildlife Mitigation Project - IDFG | complimentary and interconnected in fulfilling mitigation for Albeni Falls Dam |
9004401 | Lake Creek Watershed Acquisition - Coeur d'Alene Tribe | complimentary and interconnected in fulfilling mitigation for Albeni Falls Dam |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | .2 FTE oversight, 2.1 FTE (1 biologist, 1 tech and .1 equip operator) implementation | $68,598 |
Fringe | 30% of personnel | $20,580 |
Supplies | Plants, tools, etc | $10,000 |
Operating | Fence repair, water control structures, building mainenance, vegetation maintenance, erosion maint. | $12,000 |
Capital | vehicle lease | $6,000 |
Travel | related meetings and training | $3,500 |
Indirect | 19.8% of direct costs less contract services and capital equipment | $25,439 |
Other | heavy equipment lease and office space | $7,800 |
$153,917 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost | $153,917 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2000 budget request | $153,917 |
FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
Kalispel Tribe | law enforcement | $3,000 | unknown |
Kalispel Tribe | project vehicles/equipment | $3,000 | unknown |
Kalispel Tribe | Computer, printer | $2,000 | unknown |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Critical constraints include: funding stability over time for adequate operation & maintenance and monitoring & evaluation in order to provide HUs to BPA
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Recommendation: Fund for one year. Subsequent funding contingent on provision of results. This proposal may have been adequate for multi-year review cycle if they had provided a better description of results to date.Comments: This project proposes to enhance already acquired wetlands for conservation to increase wildlife abundance, maintain existing enhancement measures, and monitor and evaluate in terms of wildlife abundance past and proposed enhancement activities. The project is not land acquisition (that was done in 1992 and 1997) but restoration/enhancement, operations, and monitoring. Enhancement procedures are designed appropriately for specific habitat types, and all past and present activities are to be thoroughly monitored. When monitoring indicates a failure to meet project objectives modification will be enacted. This is a logical and rational approach. A drawback of this proposal is that it does not consider potential conflicts of obtaining project objectives with fisheries mitigation projects in the area. However, this appears to have been a successful project.
The proposal quality was good, in the midrange of those reviewed. The proposal references the FWP and several other statements and plans. It is related to two other projects (920611, 9004401). It involves two tribes and IDFG as a working group. There have been good accomplishments since 1991. There is good background, rationale, and relationships to other projects. The good project history shows good planning and agency cooperation. Objectives, methods, and facilities are fine. The budget seems reasonable. There are good resumes of staff. This could be a good candidate for multi-year funding.
The primary shortcoming of the proposal is the failure to provide data on the target species using the site. After over 7 years, it is poor to say they still do not have a management plan. What's the plan here for M&E? What are the milestones? It is pretty far into the project to be presenting so little monitoring and evaluation information.
Comment:
Technically Sound? Yes
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Explain how this project fits in a watershed context.Good description of enhancement activities.
Comment:
Comment:
[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$99,250 | $99,250 | $99,250 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website