FY 2000 proposal 199500700
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Hood River Production Program - PGE: O&M |
| Proposal ID | 199500700 |
| Organization | Portland General Electric - Enron (PGE) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Gary Hackett |
| Mailing address | 121 SW Salmon St Portland, OR 97204 |
| Phone / email | 5034648005 / gary_hackett@pge.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2000 |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Deschutes |
| Short description | This project reimburses PGE for those maintenance, operations, upgrades, and repairs of existing equipment and facilities at the Pelton Ladder Project needed to rear about 225,000 Spring Chinook for release in the Hood and Deschutes Rivers. |
| Target species | Spring Chinook |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
| 1995 |
Program fully developed |
| 1996 |
Program at full production |
| 1998 |
Program on going |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 8805303 |
HRPP - CTWSRO:M&E |
Transports, releases about 125k spring chinook 7 monitors same |
| 8805304 |
HRPP - ODFW: M&E |
Monitors & evaluates effectiveness of restoration actions in Hood River |
| 8902900 |
HRPP - ODFW: Hatchery |
Responsible for rearing spring chinook for program |
| 9301900 |
HRPP - CTWSRO/ODFW: Broodstock collection |
Collection of Hood River broodstock collection, egg take & transfer to Round Butte Hatchery |
|
Hood River Production Program (HRPP) - |
|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$16,700 |
| Fringe |
|
$0 |
| Supplies |
|
$0 |
| Operating |
|
$17,400 |
| Indirect |
Administration of ODFW contract |
$3,410 |
| Other |
Housing and vehicle charges |
$12,500 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$0 |
| $50,010 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2000 cost | $50,010 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2000 budget request | $50,010 |
| FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
| PGE |
No replacement cost of basic facilities which are owned by PGE |
$0 |
unknown |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: none
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Fund (high priority).
Date:
Jun 15, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Fund (high priority). OK for multi-year funding; review on an annual basis for progress towards meeting objectives.
Comments:
This is integrally linked to a number of the other key ongoing projects. The fish production herein is critical to the HRPP as it stands defined. It appears that the original concerns of using non-native fish have been addressed - unless there are some difficulties that are not apparent from the narrative. The objectives are listed only in tabular form and aren't really objectives, and measurable biological objectives aren't really biological objectives, either (they at least are not clearly stated). This proposal does not follow the standard write-up. No completion date is given, though the budget goes out through at least FY 2004. This proposal was not as well justified as the other HRPP proposals.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Criteria all: Met? N/A - Hatchery O&M funding proposal.
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Will be combined with #8902900 in the future.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000
Comment:
[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]