FY 2000 proposal 199600500

Contents

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

TitleType
199600500 Narrative Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleIndependent Scientific Advisory Board
Proposal ID199600500
OrganizationColumbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Foundation (CBFWF)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameKathie Titzler
Mailing address2701 SW First Ave., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97201
Phone / email5032290191 / kathie@cbfwf.org
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 2000
Province / SubbasinMainstem/Systemwide / Systemwide
Short descriptionProvide independent scientific advice and recommendations on issues related to regional fish and wildlife recovery programs under the Northwest Power Act and the Endangered Species Act.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1996 Review of the FWP. NPPC Report 96-6 by the Independent Scientific Group: Return to the River.
1997 Completion of 8 Reviews requested by NMFS and the Council including reviews of downstream passage for salmon, PIT Tag research, NMFS Waiver of Dissolved Gas Standard, ecological impacts of BiOp flow provisions on Hungry Horse and Libby resident fishes.
1998 Completion of 8 Reviews requested by NMFS, the Council, and Congress including review of the Corps Capital Construction Program, PIT tag workplan, and the Multi-Species Framework Scientific Principles.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
8907201 Independent Scientific Advisory Board Support BPA-DOE contract to pay for Dr. Charles Coutant's ISAB services.

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2000 cost
Personnel CBFWF admin. asst. and budget analyst $24,073
Fringe CBFWF $9,388
Supplies CBFWF $550
Travel CBFWF $250
Indirect CBFWF Cost Pool Allocation - 12.8% $77,569
Subcontractor ISAB member services, travel and supplies (allocation to be determined) $571,750
$683,580
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost$683,580
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2000 budget request$683,580
FY 2000 forecast from 1999$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
n/a $0 unknown
Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: Reviews mandated by Congress could interfere with ISAB reviews requested by NMFS and NPPC.

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
ISRP Preliminary Review (ISRP 99-2)
Recommendation:
Not Reviewed
Date:
Jun 15, 1999

Comment:

Recommendation: Not reviewed

Comments: Not Reviewed

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Nonwatershed Technical Group Comments
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

Technical Criteria 1: Met? NA - Selection process does not include tribes

Programmatic Criteria 2: Met? NA - How will independence be maintained?

Milestone Criteria 3: Met? NA - SRT report not independent

Resource Criteria 4: Met? NA - Need improved selection process to acquire independent reviewers

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Subregional Team Comments
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

Due to budget constraints and emphasis of tasks, AFM suggests that the BPA Direct Program fund 50% of this project and the remaining funds be provided by the capital and reimbursable portion of the MOA.
REVIEW:
NWPPC Funding Recommendation (NWPPC 2000-6)
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000

Comment:

[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$550,000 $550,000 $550,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website