FY 2000 proposal 199800600

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type
199800600 Narrative	Narrative

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	PATH Technical Support - James J. Anderson
Proposal ID	199800600
Organization	James J. Anderson Consulting (Anderson Consulting)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	James J. Anderson
Mailing address	3700 East Union Seattle WA 98122
Phone / email	2065434772 / jim@fish.washington.edu
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 2000
Province / Subbasin	Mainstem/Systemwide / Systemwide
Short description	Develop hypotheses underlying key salmon recovery management decisions, develop decision analyses to evaluate alternative management strategies, and assist in designing research monitoring and adaptive management experiments.
Target species	Chinook and steelhead

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment
1998	Developed alternative hypothesis on passage and extra mortality. Reviewed PATH documents

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description
9700200	PATH - UW technical support - Columbia Basin Research	Complimentary analysis will provide new alternatives to 9700200
8910800	Monitoring and Evaluation modeling support - Columbia Basin Research	Complimentary applying analyses and adding results to models
9600800	ESSA PATH	Complimentary results will provide new alternatives to 9600800
20537	Bonneville Power Administration Non-Discretionary Projects Umbrella

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2000 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2000 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2000 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2000 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 2000 cost
Personnel	Salary, Fringe benefits and overhead 489 hrs @ $100/hr	$48,900
Fringe		$0
Supplies		$0
Travel	4 trips to Portland @ $275 each	$1,100
		$50,000

Total estimated budget

Total FY 2000 cost	$50,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 2000 budget request	$50,000
FY 2000 forecast from 1999	$0
% change from forecast	0.0%

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: None

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
ISRP Preliminary Review (ISRP 99-2)

Recommendation:
Do Not Fund

Date:
Jun 15, 1999

Comment:

Recommendation: Do not fund. PATH, in its present form, with its present mission, should be phased out. A simpler process could be created to meet the continuing need for evaluation of the limited data now available to address management questions relative to the hydro biological opinion. A more ambitious and comprehensive scientific consensus process should be developed, somewhat along the lines of PATH, to address data collection design issues for the basin, to identify data needs that are critical to the actual management questions, and to ensure that data needs are met, to the extent practical, as quickly as possible, in a coordinated and efficient manner.

Comments: Similar to project 8910800. Why is this separate from 9800600?

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Do Not Fund

Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

REVIEW:
CBFWA: Subregional Team Comments

Recommendation:

Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

PATH projects reviewed in detail last year, little has changed. Question amount of hours. Needs to be related through an umbrella. Appears to duplicate work in Project #9700200.

REVIEW:
NWPPC Funding Recommendation (NWPPC 2000-6)

Recommendation:
Money placed in BPA Tech Support Project Placeholder

Date:
Mar 1, 2000

Comment:

[Decision made in 12-7-99 Council Meeting]; Funding subject to independent review: BPA non-discretionary (Technical Support Project Placeholder)