Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery |
Proposal ID | 198335000 |
Organization | Nez Perce Tribe (NPT) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | R. Ed Larson |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 365 Lapwai, ID 83540 |
Phone / email | 2088437320 / edl@nezperce.org |
Manager authorizing this project | Silas Whitman |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / Clearwater |
Short description | Implement $16 million construction of Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery (NPTH) supplementation program to assist in the recover and restoration of non-listed spring chinook and coho salmon and ESA listed Snake River fall chinook in the Clearwater subbasin. |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
1991 |
Ground water surveys completed. |
1992 |
Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Master Plan approved by NPPC, Step 1. |
1992 |
Genetic Risk Assessment of NPTH Master Plan completed. |
1994 |
NPTH Pre-Design Study completed. |
1995 |
Selway River Genetic Resource Assessment completed. |
1995 |
Supplement to the NPTH Master Plan completed (to address changes due to ESA listings). |
1996 |
NPTH Monitoring & Evaluation Plan completed. |
1997 |
NPTH Final EIS and Record of Decision. |
1997 |
NMFS issued BiOp that NPTH Program "is not likely to jeopardize" listed stocks. |
1998 |
NPPC approved Step 2 Documents - Proceed to Final Design. |
1999 |
Draft Clearwater Coho Master Plan. |
2000 |
Final Design Submitted - NPPC Step 3. |
2000 |
Final Clearwater Coho Master Plan. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
1. Coho Planning Documents |
a. NEPA/EIS Supplement |
1 |
$100,000 |
|
1. |
b. Conceptual Design |
1 |
$152,000 |
Yes |
2. Coho Experimental Monitoring & Evaluation |
a. Adult Return Assessment |
6 |
$119,000 |
|
2. |
b. Juvenile Survival Assessments |
6 |
$300,000 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
---|
$350,000 | $125,000 |
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
Construction is NOT funded by NPTH. BPA funds construction, see Project no. 1983-350-05 |
|
|
$10,459,000 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2004 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
---|
$850,000 | $1,528,000 | $650,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
1. Broodstock Development SCS/FCS |
a. Rear and release approx. 300,000 spring chinook smolts. |
1 |
$250,000 |
|
1. |
b. Rear and release approx. 625,000 spring chinook parr. |
1 |
$350,000 |
|
1. |
c. Transport and release spring chinook adults in excess of area hatchery needs. |
1 |
$38,000 |
|
2. Staff Development and Training |
a. Continue on-the-job training at area hatcheries. |
1 |
$257,000 |
|
2. |
b. Professional fish culture training for staff. |
1 |
$20,000 |
|
3. Acquire New Hatchery Equipment |
a. Purchase and inventory new equipment. |
1 |
$1,202,000 |
|
3. |
b. Setup and test new equipment. |
1 |
$50,000 |
|
4. Technology Transfer |
a. Submit quarterly and final annual reports. |
1 |
$15,000 |
|
4. |
b. Develop annual operating plan (AOP). |
1 |
$25,000 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
---|
$2,028,000 | $1,974,000 | $3,035,000 | $1,990,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
See project # 1983-350-03 submitted under separate cover. |
|
|
$1,392,000 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
---|
$1,816,000 | $1,942,000 | $1,791,000 | $1,770,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
Personnel |
FTE: 4 |
$100,000 |
Fringe |
18% |
$18,000 |
Supplies |
|
$22,000 |
Travel |
|
$22,500 |
Indirect |
26.1% |
$37,000 |
Capital |
|
$61,500 |
NEPA |
|
$100,000 |
PIT tags |
# of tags: 14,000 |
$33,600 |
Subcontractor |
|
$276,400 |
Other |
BPA FUNDS CONSTRUCTION DIRECTLY |
$10,459,000 |
Personnel |
FTE: 14 |
$480,000 |
Fringe |
20% |
$96,000 |
Supplies |
|
$140,000 |
Travel |
|
$38,000 |
Indirect |
26.6% |
$203,000 |
Capital |
|
$1,202,000 |
NEPA |
|
$0 |
Subcontractor |
|
$48,000 |
Other |
See M&E project # 1983-350-03. |
$1,392,000 |
| $14,729,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $14,729,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $14,729,000 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $6,500,000 |
% change from forecast | 126.6% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
1999, NPPC and ISRP review recommended project changes and development prior to Step 3 approval which resulted in 50% capital cost reduction and a one year delay preceding construction to meet the Measure 7.4M language described as "low cost, small scale". Subsequently, this review increased O&M, and M&E costs to meet the Council's requirements. Additional M&E and a modified O&M approach increased costs in order to provide a more temporary, experimental approach to supplementation and fish recovery.
In 1999, the construction cost estimate for FY2000 was $18,443,000, with total costs estimated at $32 million. However actual FY2000 budgets total $7,694,000 because of delays due to re-design.
Reason for change in scope
See above.
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
The budget has been adjusted due to a change in the indirect cost rate.In 1999, NWPPC and ISRP review recommended project changes and development prior to Step 3 approval which resulted in a 50% capital cost reduction and a one year delay preceding construction to meet the Measure 7.4M language described as "low cost, small scale". Subsequently, this review increased O&M, and M&E costs to meet the Council's requirements. Additional M&E and a modified O&M approach increased costs in order to provide a more temporary, experimental approach to supplementation and fish recovery. In 1999, the construction cost estimate for FY 2000 was $18,443,000, with total costs estimated at $32 million. However actual FY 2000 budgets total $7,694,000 because of delays due to redesign.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000
Comment:
Budget allocations reflect NPPC step review recommendations. Hold O&M pending submission of detail requested June, '00.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$1,974,000 |
$1,974,000 |
$1,974,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website