FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199001800

Additional documents

TitleType

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleEvaluate Rainbow Trout/Habitat Improvements Of Tribs. To Lake Roosevelt
Proposal ID199001800
OrganizationConfederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation (CCT)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameSheryl Sears
Mailing addressP.O. Box 150 Nespelem, WA. 99155
Phone / email5096342118 / sheri.sears@colvilletribes.com
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 2001 Ongoing
Province / SubbasinInter-Mountain / San Poil
Short descriptionIncrease the quality and quantity of spawning and rearing habitat in selected streams that drain into Lake Roosevelt by eliminating migration barriers, improving riparian conditions, and improving instream habitat.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1990 Fish habitat assessment on 13 streams.
1990 Fish population census on above streams (13 streams).
1991 Fish habitat assessment on 14 streams.
1991 Fish population census on above streams (14 streams).
1992 Analyzed barriers to fish migration on 5 project streams (Blue, N. Nanamkin, S. Nanamkin, Iron and Louie).
1992 Designed meander structures for North and South Nanamkin Creeks.
1993 Culvert/passage barrier on North Nanamkin repaired (culvert replaced).
1994 Culvert/passage barrier on Louie Creek repaired (1 culvert replaced).
1994 Culvert/passage barrier on Iron Creek repaired (3 culverts replaced).
1994 6000+ shrubs planted on project streams.
1994 Approximately 4.5 miles of fence installed around sections of North and South Nanamkin Creeks for riparian protection.
1994 1993 through 1995 installed approximately 125 instream structures.
1994 Approximately 150 meters of channel meanders/bank stabilization structures installed (North and South Nanamkin).
1995 Culvert/passage barrier on South Nanamkin repaired (culvert replaced with arch).
1995 Approximately 350 meters of channel meanders/bank stabilization structures installed (North and South Nanamkin).
1995 Constructed/repaired irrigation diversion structures and stream banks on South Nanamkin.
1996 Horizontal stream surveys on the 5 project streams.
1996 Population estimates of juvenile adfluvial rainbow trout.
1996 Adult spawning escapement and juvenile outmigration surveys (trapping).
1997 Horizontal stream surveys on the 5 project streams.
1997 Population estimates of juvenile adfluvial rainbow trout.
1997 Adult spawning escapement and juvenile outmigration surveys (trapping).
1998 Horizontal stream surveys on the 5 project streams.
1998 Population estimates of juvenile adfluvial rainbow trout.
1998 Adult spawning escapement and juvenile outmigration surveys (trapping).
1998 Complete Phase I Report
1999 Horizontal stream surveys on the 5 project streams.
1999 Population estimates of juvenile adfluvial rainbow trout.
1999 Adult spawning escapement and juvenile outmigration surveys (trapping).
1999 Complete Phase II Report
2000 Horizontal stream surveys on the 5 project streams.
2000 Population estimates of juvenile adfluvial rainbow trout.
2000 Adult spawning escapement and juvenile outmigration surveys (trapping).
2000 FY 1999 Annual Report with data and statistical analysis and pictorial booklet of project.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Improve/create passage for rainbow trout in Bridge Creek. a. Create a cooperative landowner/agency agreement for Bridge Creek. 1 $22,200
1. b. Design/engineer new channel 1 $25,150
1. c. Design/engineer new channel 1 $14,900 Yes
1. c. Design/engineer road crossing 1 $7,450 Yes
1. d. Develop contract(s) for bids/implementation. 1 $7,450
1. e. NEPA 1 $7,450 Yes
1. f. Baseline adult fish trapping in spring before implementation. 1 $18,640
1. g. Electroshock/population estimates in area to be affected. 1 $9,001
1. h. Baseline survey habitat. 1 $9,973
2. Create passage where manmade barriers now exist in the Lake Roosevelt Watershed. a. Research federal, state and county agencies for previous inventories of culverts and/or fish barriers. 1 $4,450
2. b. Design systematic inventory system for culverts/barriers. 1 $2,450
2. c. GPS or digitize all information on Tribal GIS system. 5 $13,450
2. d. Create cooperative agreements or MOAs with local agencies that may assist with passage improvements. 2 $1,450
2. e. Acquire culvert passage designs and manuals that are available. 1 $500
2. f. Acquire necessary training for basic design techniques and estimating. 2 $2,500
2. g. Trap adult fish in spring before implementation. 10 $0
2. h. Electroshock/population estimates in area to be affected. 10 $0
2. i. Baseline survey habitat. 10 $0
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$58,500$58,500$58,500$58,500

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Improve/create passage for rainbow trout in Bridge Creek. a. Install culvert/bridge. 1 $0 Yes
1. b. Re-create original stream channel and floodplain. 1 $0 Yes
1. c. Plant cuttings/plants. 1 $0
1. d. Acquire offsite solar water unit 1 $0
1. e. Build riparian area fence. 1 $0
2. Create passage where manmade barriers now exist in the Lake Roosevelt Watershed. a. Inventory passage barriers (GPS, photos and data sheet) in the San Poil River Subbasin. 2 $46,605
2. b. Inventory passage barriers in the Lake Roosevelt Subbasin 8 $0
2. c. Install culverts/bridges/passage improvements. 10 $0 Yes
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$100,000$100,000$250,000$100,000

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Improve/create passage for rainbow trout in Bridge Creek. a. Contract/TERO compliance 1 $0
1. b. Report writing. 3 $4,000
c. Meetings with BPA, CBFWA, NWPPC. 3 $1,400
2. Create passage where manmade barriers now exist in the Lake Roosevelt Watershed. a. Contract/TERO compliance 10 $0
2. b. Report writing. 10 $0
2. c. Meetings with BPA, CBFWA, NWPPC. 10 $0
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$10,000$10,000$10,000$10,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Improve/create passage for rainbow trout in Bridge Creek. a. Trap adult fish in spring for two years after implementation. 2 $0
1. b. Electroshock/population estimates in affected area annually for 2 years. 2 $0
1. c. Survey habitat after improvements for 2 years. 2 $0
2. Create passage where manmade barriers now exist in the Lake Roosevelt Watershed. a. Trap adult fish in spring after passage improvements. 10 $0
2. b. Electroshock/population estimates in affected area 1-3 months after juvenile emergence. 10 $0
c. Survey habitat before and after improvements (approx. 200 meters above and below crossing). 10 $0
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2002FY 2003
$100,000$100,000$40,000$100,000

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel FTE: 2.0 in 2001 $63,440
Fringe $17,387
Supplies $10,504
Travel $22,000
Indirect $26,143
NEPA $7,540
Subcontractor NRCS $0
Personnel FTE: 1.5 in 2001 $18,520
Fringe $5,786
Supplies $9,000
Travel $7,000
Indirect $6,299
Personnel $2,000
Fringe $560
Supplies $1,056
Travel $1,000
Indirect $784
$199,019
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$199,019
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$199,019
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Reason for change in estimated budget

There was no projected FY2001 forecast because results and conclusions were not available to determine the effectiveness of the project. Additionally, the project selection and sub-basin planning process is a significant departure from previous project selection processes. Project results and conclusions show a positive benefit to fish, therefore a budget for the 2001 funding period is requested to retain project continuity and provide known benefits as a result of passage improvements.

Reason for change in scope

The proposal process change for FY2001, the conclusions in the 1999 Annual Report and the new project proposal funding process has led to extending this project. Data analysis had to be accomplished before requesting extension of the project. The analysis shows that passage improvements are successful for increasing habitat availability and use, whereas instream habitat improvements were inconclusive. Project streams have to this date have shown increases in fish density after the implementation of the project. Additional streams will be examined for passage barriers and habitat improvements; some of the streams were examined in 1990 and 1991 as part of this project. Monitoring has been altered such that more funding is used for assessment and improvements in 2001 and 2002.

Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
Jul 14, 2000

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000

Comment:

Project expansion should be determined in provincial review
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:


Recommendation:
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

To complete implementation of the Bridge Creek Project additional design monies are needed for the lower section of the channel connecting passage to the San Poil River. Additional monies in 2004 will be needed to contract a engineer to oversee the on the ground implementation of the stabilization work on the 2556 feet of Bridge Creek starting from the new culvert on the Old State Road. The design for this stabilization is very detailed and complicated an engineer will be needed on site during the channel work to insure success. The additional monies in 2005 will allow for the implementation of the lower channel which will involve the construction of a new channel and outlet to the San Poil River. I have obtained grant money from Ferry County Conservation District to complete fencing and money from NRCS to do planting and off site watering troughs. I am working with the DOT on joint funding for replacement of culvert passage barriers on Highway 21 along the San Poil River. DOT has paid for the preliminary assessments and we are working on prioritization of culvert replacements. Implementation money will be needed to open passage to the priority tributaries.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$268,500 $268,500 $268,500

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website