Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Hungry Horse Fisheries Mitigation - Flathead Lake |
| Proposal ID | 199101901 |
| Organization | Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Barry Hansen |
| Mailing address | PO Box 278 Pablo, MT 59860 |
| Phone / email | 4066752700 / barryh@cskt.org |
| Manager authorizing this project | Les Evarts |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Mountain Columbia / Flathead |
| Short description | Implement and monitor fisheries improvement activities within the Flathead Indian Reservation portion of the Flathead Lake basin. Research factors limiting successful application of mitigation measures within Flathead Lake. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
| 94 |
Monitoring: Completion of the 1992-93 Flathead Lake Creel survey. |
| 95 |
Implementation: Reconstruction of groundwater seepage on Polson Golf Course into a stream channel flowing into Flathead Lake. |
| 98 |
Implementation: Channel reconstruction in Skidoo Creek to allow passage of fish through a culvert barrier. |
| 98 |
Monitoring: Completion of monitoring of the Flathead Lake kokanee experiment. |
| 98 |
Planning: Progress Report summarizing data collected in Dayton Creek for the purpose of identifying restoration priorities |
| 99 |
Monitoring: Completion of the 1998-99 Flathead Lake Creel survey |
| 99 |
Implementation: Riparian fencing and removal of an over-channel corral from Dayton Creek. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
| 1. In conjunction with Project # 9608701, develop site specific restoration projects |
a. Continue watershed level reviews of degraded sites that influence the factors limiting fisheries production. |
indefinite |
$7,956 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|
| $8,000 | $8,000 | $8,000 | $8,000 |
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
| 1. Implement specific habitat restoration projects that we identified as influencing the factors limiting fish production. |
a. Culvert removal and bridge construction on Red Lake Road. |
one |
$33,068 |
|
|
b. Reconstruction of Hawkins irrigation diversions. |
one |
$4,000 |
|
|
c. Reconstruction of Crafton culvert |
one |
$2,000 |
|
|
d. Removal of Laudermilk in-stream dam |
one |
$4,000 |
|
|
e. Construction and maintenance of Dayton Creek sediment trap |
indefinite |
$3,000 |
|
|
f. Fencing of 3 miles of riparian area |
indefinite |
$14,000 |
|
|
g. Removal of culvert and road fill on old Lake Mary Ronan Road |
one |
$3,000 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|
| $80,000 | $80,000 | $80,000 | $80,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
| 1. Purchase of equipment and materials to support mitigation projects |
a. Purchase equipment, and provide for repair of existing equipment as needed. |
indefinite |
$2,400 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|
| $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
| 1. Monitoring native species abundance in Flathead Lake |
a. Spring gillnetting |
indefinite |
$8,000 |
|
| 2. Monitoring biology of lake trout in Flathead Lake |
a. Fall gillnetting |
indefinite |
$11,624 |
|
| 3. Monitoring success of off-site fish plants |
a. creel surveys and fish sampling |
indefinite |
$5,000 |
|
| 4. Monitoring exploitation rates of sport fish in Flathead Lake |
a. year-long creel survey |
one |
$20,000 |
|
| 4. Research in factors controlling Mysis abundance in Flathead Lake. |
a. Biweekly Mysis sampling with associated limnological parameters |
two |
$48,000 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|
| $105,000 | $105,000 | $105,000 | $105,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
FTE: 0.1 |
$3,000 |
| Fringe |
21% |
$630 |
| Indirect |
20%-requested rate waiting for approval
14% is current approved rate |
$1,326 |
| NEPA |
|
$3,000 |
| Subcontractor |
University of Montana |
$0 |
| Personnel |
FTE: .3 |
$9,000 |
| Fringe |
21% |
$1,890 |
| Supplies |
|
$10,000 |
| Indirect |
20%-requested rate waiting for approval
14% is current approved rate |
$2,178 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$40,000 |
| Supplies |
|
$2,000 |
| Indirect |
20%-requested rate waiting for approval
14% is current approved rate |
$400 |
| Personnel |
FTE: 1.8 |
$28,000 |
| Fringe |
21% |
$13,020 |
| Supplies |
|
$2,000 |
| Travel |
|
$6,000 |
| Indirect |
20%-requested rate waiting for approval
14% if current approved rate |
$23,604 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$20,000 |
| $166,048 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $166,048 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $166,048 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $95,000 |
| % change from forecast | 74.8% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
The budget increase is the result of the transfer of funds from Project # 9608701 as directed by BPA, and additional specific habitat restoration projects scheduled for completion in FY2001.
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
CSKT intends to fund $20,000 with a cost share.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000
Comment:
Project budget incorporates implementation costs from 1996-087-01
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $143,942 |
$143,942 |
$143,942 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website