FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199603501
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Satus Watershed Restoration |
Proposal ID | 199603501 |
Organization | Yakama Nation (YN) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Lynn Hatcher, Fisheries Program Manager |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 |
Phone / email | 5098656262 / lynn@yakama.com |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Yakima |
Short description | Enhance and protect summer steelhead spawning and rearing habitat by restoring the ecological function of the Satus Creek watershed. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1996 - present. Developed and maintained an extensive streamflow monitoring network across the watershed. | |
1996 - present. Developed and maintained an extensive water temperature and turbidity monitoring network across the watershed. | |
1996 - present. Expanded and continued the tribes redd survey efforts. | |
1996 - present. Improved grazing management: fencing, water development, rest from grazing of sensitive areas | |
1996 - present. Revegetation: reestablishment of site-appropriate native vegetation in riparian areas, floodplains, ephemeral channels, on road cut slopes, and erodible uplands. | |
1996- present. Headwater meadow restoration: stabilize incised channels, control grazing, reestablish native vegetation, construct low sediment trapping check-dams in intermittent channels. | |
1996 - 1999. Fire rehabilitation: water bar fire lines, revegetate fire lines and burned areas, riparian areas and uplands, utilize large woody debris for sediment trapping on slopes, incorporate large wood into channels. | |
1997 - 1998. Implemented a watershed wide anadromous fish habitat and population monitoring program following the Washington State Timber Fish and Wildlife monitoring protocol. | |
1997 - 1998. Large woody debris placement: add whole trees to channel in forested stream reaches that had previously been cleaned, targeting locations that increase backwater habitat or channel/floodplain interactions | |
1997 - present. Developed and maintained an extensive climate monitoring network across the watershed. | |
1997 - 1998. Aspen regeneration: propagate aspen for planting into sites suitable for beaver habitat enhancement | |
1997 | Placement of boulders into a steep, confined, bedrock reach of Satus Creek to improve fish passage. This steepened section of channel was created by blasting during the construction of S.R. 97. |
1997 | Dike removal: several dikes were removed from the left bank of Satus Creek along a 4-mile reach above the uppermost crossing of S.R. 97. Large boulders extracted from the dikes were placed in the channel to improve aquatic habitat. |
1998 | Developed GIS map of Satus Creek riparian vegetation and stream channel for the years 1949, 1995 and 1997. |
1998 - present. Road relocation/obliteration: four miles of floodplain road along Satus Creek was obliterated. Other relocations/obliterations completed include segments along Wilson-Charley and Seattle creeks. A project is underway along Shinando Cr. | |
1998 - present. Beaver habitat enhancement: plant aspen in suitable locations, regenerate other hardwood species, remove immature conifers encroaching on aspen stands. Some beaver reintroductions will occur late in summer of 2000. | |
1998 - present. Assisted BIA Range Management Program with monitoring and enforcing grazing permit compliance. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
Improve aquatic habitat | A) Restore grass and woody vegetation in areas critical to watershed function B) Enhance beaver habitat C) Rehabilitate incised ephemeral and intermittent channels. | 4 | $30,000 | |
Restore natural riparian and upland vegetation patterns | A) Continue the patrol and maintenance of range fences. B) Reintegrate fire as a landscape process. C) Continue leasing of range units | 4 | $50,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
---|---|---|
$50,000 | $50,000 | $50,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maintain existing restoration treatments. | A) Maintain existing facilities. B) Maintain existing treatments | 4 | $20,000 | |
Maintain existing monitoring facilities and efforts. | A) Maintain existing monitoring efforts and equipment B) Continue existing fisheries survey | 4 | $20,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
---|---|---|
$40,000 | $40,000 | $40,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
Monitor and evaluate cost-effectiveness of restoration treatments | A) Characterize and quantify streamflow B) Climatological monitoring C) Characterize stream habitat conditions D) Fisheries survey | 4 | $40,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
---|---|---|
$40,000 | $40,000 | $40,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 1 combined professional and technician FTE | $26,857 |
Fringe | @ 25.3% | $6,795 |
Supplies | Vehicles, field supplies, equipment rental, etc. | $31,125 |
Indirect | $15,223 | |
Personnel | FTE: .5 - professional and technicians combined | $13,429 |
Fringe | @ 25.3% | $3,398 |
Supplies | Vehicles, equipment repair and upgrade, field supplies, etc. | $15,562 |
Indirect | @ 23.5% | $7,611 |
Personnel | FTE: .5 - professional and technicians combined | $13,429 |
Fringe | @ 25.3% | $3,398 |
Supplies | Vehicles, instrument upgrade and repair, etc. | $15,562 |
Indirect | @ 23.5% | $7,611 |
$160,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $160,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $160,000 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $400,000 |
% change from forecast | -60.0% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
Watershed analysis indicates that future activities should to focus on land use management.
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
Watershed analysis indicates that future activities should focus on land use management. This project is scaling down to an O&M operating budget. There is no change in the scope of work.Comment:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$388,600 | $388,600 | $388,600 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website