FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199700400
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Resident Fish Stock Status Above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams |
| Proposal ID | 199700400 |
| Organization | Kalispel Tribe of Indians (KNRD) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Neil Lockwood |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 39 Usk, WA 99180 |
| Phone / email | 5094451147 / nlockwood@knrd.org |
| Manager authorizing this project | Joseph Maroney |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Assess the stocks and status of all 36 resident fish species known to exist in the blocked area. Investigate interactions between species and habitats. Recommend and implement management actions for blocked area fisheries based on investigations. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1997 | Formalized blocked area coordination group represented by the Kalispel Natural Resource Department, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Spokane Tribe of Indians, and Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation. |
| 1998 | Collection of historical data on the streams and lakes of the Spokane Indian Reservation (SIR). |
| 1998 | Box Canyon adfluvial trapping project |
| 1999 | Coordinated methods for blocked area fisheries assessments |
| 1999 | Began fish and habitat assessments on tributaries of the SIR (Concentrating mainly on Sand Creek) |
| 1999 | Began water quality and productivity sampling of lakes on SIR |
| 1999 | Gather all known existing data. |
| 1999 | Constructed data storage and analysis system. |
| 1999 | Box Canyon Reservoir migratory report |
| 1999 | Spokane River historical assessment, previously collected data report |
| 2000 | Continue fish (snorkel/electroshocking) and habitat assessments on tributaries of the SIR (Concentrating on Blue Creek, Oyachen, Orzada, and Castle Rock) |
| 2000 | Conduct sampling on Boundary Reservoir |
| 2000 | Conducted habitat assessments and snorkeling surveys on tributaries to Boundary Reservoir |
| 2000 | Ecological investigations on lakes on the Colville Reservation |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Project administration, organization and coordination. | a. Ensure project is achieving objectives. | $11,000 | ||
| b. Meet at a minimum on a quarterly basis to determine progress of project. | $12,000 | Yes | ||
| c. GIS and data management | $49,000 | Yes | ||
| d. Research and development of study plans for future work. | $33,000 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
| FY 2003 | FY 2005 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $110,000 | $114,000 | $112,000 | $108,000 |
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Compile stocking and baseline ecological information for North Skookum, South Skookum, and Browns lakes. | a. Collect baseline ecological information on North Skookum, South Skookum, and Browns lakes. | 1 | $41,000 | |
| b. Compile WDFW stocking records for the lakes. | 1 | $4,000 | ||
| c. Construction, repair, and maintenance of field equipment. | 1 | $10,000 | ||
| d. Input data from sampling and quality control. | 1 | $12,000 | ||
| e. Analyze scales. | 1 | $10,000 | ||
| d. Report based on collected information, established biological objectives and prescribe management strategies. | 1 | $15,000 | ||
| 2. Describe adfluvial salmonid migrations on Tacoma Creek | a. Place upstream and downstream migratory traps and weirs in Tacoma Creek | 1 | $6,000 | |
| b. Monitor traps daily for fish movements | 1 | $9,000 | ||
| c. Maintain traps and weirs daily. | 1 | $9,000 | ||
| d. Input, analyze and report research results. | 1 | $10,000 | ||
| 4. Continue collecting information and filling data gaps. Work will concentrate on the lakes and streams on the SIR as well as surveys on streams flowing onto the SIR. | a. Perform fish and habitat survey on Little Tshimikain Creek | 1 | $21,000 | Yes |
| b. Begin fish and habitat survey on Tshimikain Creek | 1 | $22,000 | Yes | |
| c. Continue sampling water quality, productivity, and fish assemblages on lakes on the SIR. | 5 | $17,000 | Yes | |
| 5. Estimate species present and relative densities in Little Spokane River Watershed. Estimate age structure of sport fish populations via scale analysis. | a. Working with KNRD, design detailed sampling plans and schedules for implementation. | 1 | $6,000 | Yes |
| b. Construction, repair, and maintenance of field equipment. | 1 | $15,000 | Yes | |
| c. Conduct field sampling to collect all potential species in all habitat types during all times of the year. | 1 | $45,000 | Yes | |
| d. Input data from sampling and quality control. | 1 | $14,000 | Yes | |
| e. Analyze scales. | 1 | $14,000 | Yes | |
| f. Analyze data and report results. | 1 | $15,000 | Yes | |
| g. Genetics collection and analysis | 1 | $31,000 | Yes | |
| 6. Study biological integrity of lakes on the Colville Reservation. | a. Determine fish dominance | 1 | $16,000 | Yes |
| b. Determine relative abundance of Daphnia | 1 | $10,000 | Yes | |
| c. Identify dominant phytoplankton taxa. | 1 | $10,000 | Yes | |
| d. Determine zooplankton diversity, dominance and biomass. | 1 | $10,000 | Yes | |
| e. Determine status of littoral zone (macrophytes) | 1 | $8,000 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2003 | FY 2005 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $390,000 | $400,000 | $395,000 | $410,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: .8 | $32,000 |
| Fringe | 33% | $10,400 |
| Supplies | $5,000 | |
| Travel | $1,000 | |
| Indirect | 20% | $9,600 |
| Subcontractor | Spokane Tribe | $8,000 |
| Subcontractor | Colville Tribe | $8,000 |
| Subcontractor | WDFW | $17,000 |
| Other | Office space rent | $14,000 |
| Subcontractor | Fish tagging | $0 |
| Personnel | FTE: 1.8 | $64,000 |
| Fringe | 33% | $21,000 |
| Supplies | $10,000 | |
| Travel | $9,000 | |
| Indirect | 20.0% | $21,000 |
| Subcontractor | WDFW | $140,000 |
| Subcontractor | Spokane Tribe | $61,000 |
| Subcontractor | Colville Tribe | $54,000 |
| $485,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $485,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $485,000 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $438,000 |
| % change from forecast | 10.7% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
This is a $47,000 (10.7%) increase from the 2000 projection spread over the 4 represented fish managers in the Joint Stock Project. The original projection was estimated while the storage facility and analysis system was still in the state of development. As data was compiled, a more accurate scope and budget to fill the data voids was developed.
Reason for change in scope
One of the primary goals of this project is to avoid having the database become a simple repository of information. Functionally it should sort the existing information and be used to drive the scope from year to year. The collection of existing information is beginning to drive the scope.
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Comment:
Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review. Project expansion should be determined in provincial reviewREVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
expense
Date:
May 2005
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $540,000 | $540,000 | $540,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website