FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199705100
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Yakima Side Channels |
| Proposal ID | 199705100 |
| Organization | Yakama Nation Fisheries Management Program (YN) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Scott Nicolai |
| Mailing address | 201 North Pearl Ellensburg, WA 98926 |
| Phone / email | 5099626142 / snicolai@yakama.com |
| Manager authorizing this project | Melvin Sampson |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Yakima |
| Short description | Protect, restore and reestablish access to productive off-channel rearing habitats, and protect and reconnect floodplains associated with the mainstem Yakima and Naches Rivers. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1998 | Signed MOU, placed an option on a 60 acre parcel in the Gleed Reach |
| 1998 | Developed proposal for a side channel restoration project in the Union Gap Reach |
| 1999 | Purchased 60 acre parcel in the Gleed Reach |
| 1999 | Restored riparian habitat function at two sites in the Union Gap Reach |
| 1999 | Processed an option to purchase a 150 acre parcel |
| 1999 | Developed a restoration project to reconnect a side channel in collaboration with a city and others |
| 1999 | Contracted appraisals on five parcels |
| 2000 | Placed an option on a parcel in the Easton Reach |
| 2000 | Processed an MOU with a city for a large restoration project in the Easton Reach |
| 2000 | Held preliminary meetings with owners of ten parcels |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Protect Rearing Habitat | a. Identify priority reaches | 1 | $0 | |
| 1. | b. Meet with private landowners, other agency representatives | 5 | $8,184 | |
| 1. | c. Process MOU's, other agreements with landowners | 5 | $8,184 | |
| 1. | d. Obtain appraisals, NEPA compliance, cultural survey, hazardous materials surveys, other land reviews. | 5 | $8,184 | |
| 2. Restore Rearing Habitat | a. Identify priority reaches | 1 | $0 | |
| 2. | b. Meet with private landowners, other agency representatives | 5 | $8,184 | |
| 2. | c. Process MOU's, other agreements with landowners | 5 | $8,183 | |
| 2. | d. Obtain NEPA compliance, other permits, cultural survey, hazardous materials surveys, other land reviews. | 5 | $8,184 | |
| 2. | e. Develop engineered designs for project implementation | 5 | $50,000 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
| FY 2005 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $126,000 | $112,000 | $119,000 | $106,000 |
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Protect Rearing Habitat | a. Purchase property | 5 | $106,344 | |
| 1. | b. Purchase easements | 5 | $106,344 | |
| 2. Restore Rearing Habitat | a. Implement restoration projects | 5 | $212,688 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
| FY 2005 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $537,000 | $478,000 | $506,000 | $451,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Restore Rearing Habitat | a. Conduct weed control | 3 | $3,173 | Yes |
| 1. | b. Control access | 2 | $13,173 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
| FY 2005 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20,000 | $18,000 | $19,000 | $17,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3. Evaluate project efficacy | a. Conduct fish population surveys | 5 | $5,728 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2005 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7,000 | $6,000 | $7,000 | $6,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 0.4 | $14,802 |
| Fringe | 25.3% | $3,745 |
| Supplies | Office, internet, software, maps, misc | $5,000 |
| Travel | To training sessions | $700 |
| Indirect | 23.5% | $5,699 |
| NEPA | Two EA's | $5,000 |
| Subcontractor | Engineering | $50,000 |
| Other | Other stuff that didn't fit into this table, e.g. training, utilities, vehicle, insurance | $14,157 |
| Personnel | FTE: .4 | $14,802 |
| Fringe | 25.3% | $3,745 |
| Supplies | field gear | $2,000 |
| Indirect | 23.5% | $4,829 |
| Capital | land acquisitions | $200,000 |
| Subcontractor | Construction | $200,000 |
| Personnel | FTE: 0.1 | $3,701 |
| Fringe | 25.3% | $937 |
| Supplies | Herbicide, misc | $500 |
| Indirect | 23.5% | $1,208 |
| Subcontractor | Construction (road obliteration) | $10,000 |
| Personnel | FTE: 0.1 | $3,701 |
| Fringe | 25.3% | $937 |
| Indirect | 23.5% | $1,090 |
| $546,553 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $546,553 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $200,000 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $346,553 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $800,000 |
| % change from forecast | -56.7% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
Delays in Project Implementation
Reason for change in scope
No change in scope has been proposed.
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
Delays have occurred in project implementation and the budget has been reduced to reflect those delays. There is no change in the scope of work. Proposed $200,000 in FY 2000 carry forward.Comment:
Rationale: Previous commitments remain available for scope of work; Assumes carry-forward of $1,141,016 in unspent FY2000 balance. Allocate to CIREVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
capital
capital
Date:
May 2005
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $0 | $1,728,704 | $1,728,704 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website