FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199802800
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Trout Creek watershed Improvement |
| Proposal ID | 199802800 |
| Organization | Jefferson County Soil & Water Conservation District (Jefferson Co. SWCD) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Mike O'connell |
| Mailing address | 625 SE Salmon Ave. Suite #6 Redmond, OR 97756 |
| Phone / email | 5419238018 / mike-oconnell@or.nacdnet.org |
| Manager authorizing this project | Thomas E. Morse |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Deschutes |
| Short description | Development of a comprehensive watershed assessment and long-range action plan for long-term protection and enhancement of fish and wildlife habitat in the Trout Creek watershed. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1998 | Two infiltration galleries were installed in Trout Creek which eliminated three push-up dams (barriers to fish migration) and converted flood irrigation to more efficient sprinkler irrigation. |
| 1998 | From 1998-2000 funds have been spent on outreach to private landowners and collecting background data for the watershed assessment/long-range watershed restoration plan. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. basin-wide watershed evaluation | a. comprehensive watershed assessment | 2 | $115,000 | |
| 2. site-specific project evaluation | b. long-range watershed restoration plan | 1 | $5,000 | |
| other: personnel, travel, supplies | $72,100 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. create off-site watering | a. 2 spring developments | 1 | $6,000 | Yes |
| 2. eliminate push-up dams/fish passage barrier | b. 1 infiltration gallery | 1 | $20,000 | Yes |
| 3. erosion control/water retention | c. 3 water/sediment control basins | 1 | $15,000 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 3 employees for 20 mo. @ 3,040 per mo. | $60,800 |
| Fringe | state/federal withholding & benefits x 30% included | $0 |
| Supplies | general office supplies | $2,400 |
| Travel | 2 vehicles rented for 12 months plus mileage | $8,900 |
| Other | watershed assessment/long-range plan | $120,000 |
| $192,100 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $192,100 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $192,100 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: yes
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: yes
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
The budget was held to the level assigned by the CEOR SRT in FY 2000. The watershed assessment work is new and appears to be heavy on personnel costs. It is unclear what the $115,000 for the assessment is paying for. This work was not identified in the FY 2000 proposal and should be reviewed for technical merit before being funded. Is this information readily available from the EDT analysis that has been completed for the Deschutes River?Comment:
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
expense
Date:
May 2005
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $130,560 | $130,560 | $130,560 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website